From: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com>,
Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@netfilter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
coreteam@netfilter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] net-next: frags: add inetpeer frag_mem tracking
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2022 13:54:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220911115447.GA101734@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89iKMe7WZS-Q4rzqEUUD+ANL6Fmb6BnFo8TvX7y_EVi=HOw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 09:06:59AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> It can be disabled if needed, by changing ipfrag_max_dist sysctl.
I understand your reluctance to add another dependency on inetpeer.
> Quite frankly IPv4 reassembly unit is a toy, I am always surprised
> some applications are still relying on IP fragments.
Do you think there's any room for improvement in IP fragments? I
believe that it is possible to make frags less fragile and prone
to overload in real-world scenarios.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-12 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-29 11:46 [PATCH 3/4] net-next: frags: add inetpeer frag_mem tracking Richard Gobert
2022-08-29 22:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-09-01 15:01 ` Richard Gobert
2022-09-01 16:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-09-11 11:54 ` Richard Gobert [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220911115447.GA101734@debian \
--to=richardbgobert@gmail.com \
--cc=alex.aring@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=stefan@datenfreihafen.org \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).