netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 3/9] netfilter: conntrack: avoid reload of ct->status
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 13:32:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230118123208.17167-4-fw@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230118123208.17167-1-fw@strlen.de>

Compiler can't merge the two test_bit() calls, so load ct->status
once and use non-atomic accesses.

This is fine because IPS_EXPECTED or NAT_CLASH are either set at ct
creation time or not at all, but compiler can't know that.

Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
---
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c      |  9 +++++----
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c | 10 ++++++----
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index 81ece117033a..9e12cade4e0f 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -1854,14 +1854,15 @@ resolve_normal_ct(struct nf_conn *tmpl,
 	if (NF_CT_DIRECTION(h) == IP_CT_DIR_REPLY) {
 		ctinfo = IP_CT_ESTABLISHED_REPLY;
 	} else {
+		unsigned long status = READ_ONCE(ct->status);
+
 		/* Once we've had two way comms, always ESTABLISHED. */
-		if (test_bit(IPS_SEEN_REPLY_BIT, &ct->status)) {
+		if (likely(status & IPS_SEEN_REPLY))
 			ctinfo = IP_CT_ESTABLISHED;
-		} else if (test_bit(IPS_EXPECTED_BIT, &ct->status)) {
+		else if (status & IPS_EXPECTED)
 			ctinfo = IP_CT_RELATED;
-		} else {
+		else
 			ctinfo = IP_CT_NEW;
-		}
 	}
 	nf_ct_set(skb, ct, ctinfo);
 	return 0;
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c
index 3b516cffc779..6b9206635b24 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c
@@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ int nf_conntrack_udp_packet(struct nf_conn *ct,
 			    const struct nf_hook_state *state)
 {
 	unsigned int *timeouts;
+	unsigned long status;
 
 	if (udp_error(skb, dataoff, state))
 		return -NF_ACCEPT;
@@ -96,26 +97,27 @@ int nf_conntrack_udp_packet(struct nf_conn *ct,
 	if (!timeouts)
 		timeouts = udp_get_timeouts(nf_ct_net(ct));
 
-	if (!nf_ct_is_confirmed(ct))
+	status = READ_ONCE(ct->status);
+	if ((status & IPS_CONFIRMED) == 0)
 		ct->proto.udp.stream_ts = 2 * HZ + jiffies;
 
 	/* If we've seen traffic both ways, this is some kind of UDP
 	 * stream. Set Assured.
 	 */
-	if (test_bit(IPS_SEEN_REPLY_BIT, &ct->status)) {
+	if (status & IPS_SEEN_REPLY_BIT) {
 		unsigned long extra = timeouts[UDP_CT_UNREPLIED];
 		bool stream = false;
 
 		/* Still active after two seconds? Extend timeout. */
 		if (time_after(jiffies, ct->proto.udp.stream_ts)) {
 			extra = timeouts[UDP_CT_REPLIED];
-			stream = true;
+			stream = (status & IPS_ASSURED) == 0;
 		}
 
 		nf_ct_refresh_acct(ct, ctinfo, skb, extra);
 
 		/* never set ASSURED for IPS_NAT_CLASH, they time out soon */
-		if (unlikely((ct->status & IPS_NAT_CLASH)))
+		if (unlikely((status & IPS_NAT_CLASH)))
 			return NF_ACCEPT;
 
 		/* Also, more likely to be important, and not a probe */
-- 
2.38.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-01-18 13:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-18 12:31 [PATCH net-next 0/9] Netfilter updates for net-next Florian Westphal
2023-01-18 12:32 ` [PATCH net-next 1/9] netfilter: conntrack: sctp: use nf log infrastructure for invalid packets Florian Westphal
2023-01-18 13:30   ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-01-18 12:32 ` [PATCH net-next 2/9] netfilter: conntrack: remove pr_debug calls Florian Westphal
2023-01-18 12:32 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2023-01-23 11:38   ` [PATCH net-next 3/9] netfilter: conntrack: avoid reload of ct->status Roi Dayan
2023-01-18 12:32 ` [PATCH net-next 4/9] netfilter: conntrack: move rcu read lock to nf_conntrack_find_get Florian Westphal
2023-01-18 12:32 ` [PATCH net-next 5/9] netfilter: ip_tables: remove clusterip target Florian Westphal
2023-01-18 12:32 ` [PATCH net-next 6/9] netfilter: nf_tables: add static key to skip retpoline workarounds Florian Westphal
2023-01-18 12:32 ` [PATCH net-next 7/9] netfilter: nf_tables: avoid retpoline overhead for objref calls Florian Westphal
2023-01-18 12:32 ` [PATCH net-next 8/9] netfilter: nf_tables: avoid retpoline overhead for some ct expression calls Florian Westphal
2023-01-18 12:32 ` [PATCH net-next 9/9] netfilter: nf_tables: add support to destroy operation Florian Westphal
2023-01-19  7:29   ` Vlad Buslov
2023-01-20  9:58     ` Fernando F. Mancera
2023-01-20 10:06       ` Fernando F. Mancera

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230118123208.17167-4-fw@strlen.de \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).