From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Jeremy Sowden <jeremy@azazel.net>
Cc: Netfilter Devel <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next 00/13] Support for shifted port-ranges in NAT
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 13:46:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230307124638.GE13059@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230305121817.2234734-1-jeremy@azazel.net>
Jeremy Sowden <jeremy@azazel.net> wrote:
> Jeremy Sowden (13):
> netfilter: nft_nat: correct length for loading protocol registers
> netfilter: nft_masq: correct length for loading protocol registers
> netfilter: nft_redir: correct value of inet type `.maxattrs`
> netfilter: nft_redir: correct length for loading protocol registers
I think the fixess above should be routed through the 'nf' tree, I
don't see why we need to hold them in -next trees for another 3 months.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-07 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-05 12:18 [PATCH nf-next 00/13] Support for shifted port-ranges in NAT Jeremy Sowden
2023-03-05 12:18 ` [PATCH nf-next 01/13] netfilter: conntrack: fix typo Jeremy Sowden
2023-03-05 12:18 ` [PATCH nf-next 02/13] netfilter: nat: fix indentation of function arguments Jeremy Sowden
2023-03-05 12:18 ` [PATCH nf-next 03/13] netfilter: nat: extend core support for shifted port-ranges Jeremy Sowden
2023-03-05 12:18 ` [PATCH nf-next 04/13] netfilter: nft_nat: correct length for loading protocol registers Jeremy Sowden
2023-03-05 12:18 ` [PATCH nf-next 05/13] netfilter: nft_nat: add support for shifted port-ranges Jeremy Sowden
2023-03-07 12:27 ` Florian Westphal
2023-03-07 18:42 ` Jeremy Sowden
2023-03-05 12:18 ` [PATCH nf-next 06/13] netfilter: nft_masq: correct length for loading protocol registers Jeremy Sowden
2023-03-05 12:18 ` [PATCH nf-next 07/13] netfilter: nft_masq: deduplicate eval call-backs Jeremy Sowden
2023-03-05 12:18 ` [PATCH nf-next 08/13] netfilter: nft_masq: add support for shifted port-ranges Jeremy Sowden
2023-03-05 12:18 ` [PATCH nf-next 09/13] netfilter: nft_redir: correct value of inet type `.maxattrs` Jeremy Sowden
2023-03-05 12:18 ` [PATCH nf-next 10/13] netfilter: nf_nat_redirect: use `struct nf_nat_range2` in ipv4 API Jeremy Sowden
2023-03-07 12:35 ` Florian Westphal
2023-03-05 12:18 ` [PATCH nf-next 11/13] netfilter: nft_redir: correct length for loading protocol registers Jeremy Sowden
2023-03-05 12:18 ` [PATCH nf-next 12/13] netfilter: nft_redir: deduplicate eval call-backs Jeremy Sowden
2023-03-07 12:37 ` Florian Westphal
2023-03-07 18:42 ` Jeremy Sowden
2023-03-05 12:18 ` [PATCH nf-next 13/13] netfilter: nft_redir: add support for shifted port-ranges Jeremy Sowden
2023-03-07 12:46 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2023-03-07 19:35 ` [PATCH nf-next 00/13] Support for shifted port-ranges in NAT Jeremy Sowden
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230307124638.GE13059@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=jeremy@azazel.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox