From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC12EB64D9 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2023 20:21:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229643AbjGGUVA (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jul 2023 16:21:00 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46810 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229471AbjGGUU7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jul 2023 16:20:59 -0400 Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc (Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:237:300::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8883E26A5; Fri, 7 Jul 2023 13:20:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fw by Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qHrw9-00066o-F8; Fri, 07 Jul 2023 22:20:17 +0200 Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 22:20:17 +0200 From: Florian Westphal To: Daniel Xu Cc: pablo@netfilter.org, kuba@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, davem@davemloft.net, kadlec@netfilter.org, pabeni@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org, fw@strlen.de, daniel@iogearbox.net, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/6] netfilter: bpf: Prevent defrag module unload while link active Message-ID: <20230707202017.GD11622@breakpoint.cc> References: <7549d65daa702ba89aa3e43d5a1bbd562d569a99.1688748455.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7549d65daa702ba89aa3e43d5a1bbd562d569a99.1688748455.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Daniel Xu wrote: > While in practice we could handle the module being unloaded while a > netfilter link (that requested defrag) was active, it's a better user > experience to prevent the defrag module from going away. It would > violate user expectations if fragmented packets started showing up if > some other part of the system tried to unload defrag module. Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal