From: Thomas Haller <thaller@redhat.com>
To: NetFilter <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Thomas Haller <thaller@redhat.com>
Subject: [nft v2 PATCH 3/3] py: add input_{set,get}_flags() API to helpers
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 10:48:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230714084943.1080757-3-thaller@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230714084943.1080757-1-thaller@redhat.com>
Note that the corresponding API for output flags does not expose the
plain numeric flags. Instead, it exposes the underlying, flag-based C
API more directly.
Reasons:
- a flags property has the benefits that adding new flags is very light
weight. Otherwise, every addition of a flag requires new API. That new
API increases the documentation and what the user needs to understand.
With a flag API, we just need new documentation what the new flag is.
It's already clear how to use it.
- opinionated, also the usage of "many getter/setter API" is not have
better usability. Its convenient when we can do similar things (setting
a boolean flag) depending on an argument of a function, instead of
having different functions.
Compare
ctx.set_reversedns_output(True)
ctx.set_handle_output(True)
with
ctx.ouput_set_flags(NFT_CTX_OUTPUT_REVERSEDNS | NFT_CTX_OUTPUT_HANDLE)
Note that the vast majority of users of this API will just create one
nft_ctx instance and set the flags once. Each user application
probably has only one place where they call the setter once. So
while I think flags have better usability, it doesn't matter much
either way.
- if individual properties are preferable over flags, then the C API
should also do that. In other words, the Python API should be similar
to the underlying C API.
- I don't understand how to do this best. Is Nftables.output_flags
public API? It appears to be, as it has no underscore. Why does this
additional mapping from function (get_reversedns_output()) to name
("reversedns") to number (1<<0) exist?
Downside is the inconsistency with the existing output flags API.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Haller <thaller@redhat.com>
---
This is probably a controversial approach :)
py/nftables.py | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
diff --git a/py/nftables.py b/py/nftables.py
index b9fa63bb8789..795700db45ef 100644
--- a/py/nftables.py
+++ b/py/nftables.py
@@ -21,6 +21,16 @@ import os
NFTABLES_VERSION = "0.1"
+"""Prevent blocking DNS lookups for IP addresses.
+
+By default, nftables will try to resolve IP addresses with blocking getaddrinfo() API.
+By setting this flag, only literal IP adddresses are supported in input.
+
+This numeric flag can be passed to Nftables.input_get_flags() and Nftables.input_set_flags().
+"""
+NFT_CTX_INPUT_NO_DNS = 1
+
+
class SchemaValidator:
"""Libnftables JSON validator using jsonschema"""
@@ -159,6 +169,27 @@ class Nftables:
def __del__(self):
self.nft_ctx_free(self.__ctx)
+ def input_get_flags(self):
+ """Query input flags for the nft context.
+
+ See input_get_flags() for supported flags.
+
+ Returns the currently set input flags as number.
+ """
+ return self.nft_ctx_input_get_flags(self.__ctx)
+
+ def input_set_flags(self, flags):
+ """Set input flags for the nft context as number.
+
+ By default, a new context objects has no flags set.
+
+ Supported flags are NFT_CTX_INPUT_NO_DNS (0x1) to disable blocking address
+ lookup via getaddrinfo.
+
+ Returns nothing.
+ """
+ self.nft_ctx_input_set_flags(self.__ctx, flags)
+
def __get_output_flag(self, name):
flag = self.output_flags[name]
return self.nft_ctx_output_get_flags(self.__ctx) & flag
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-14 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-10 17:46 [nft PATCH] nftables: add flag for nft context to avoid blocking getaddrinfo() Thomas Haller
2023-07-10 17:58 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-07-14 8:48 ` [nft v2 PATCH 1/3] nftables: add input flags for nft_ctx Thomas Haller
2023-07-14 8:48 ` [nft v2 PATCH 2/3] nftables: add input flag NFT_CTX_INPUT_NO_DNS to avoid blocking getaddrinfo() Thomas Haller
2023-07-14 10:07 ` Phil Sutter
2023-07-18 9:12 ` Thomas Haller
2023-07-14 8:48 ` Thomas Haller [this message]
2023-07-14 9:59 ` [nft v2 PATCH 3/3] py: add input_{set,get}_flags() API to helpers Phil Sutter
2023-07-18 10:07 ` Thomas Haller
2023-07-14 10:16 ` [nft v2 PATCH 1/3] nftables: add input flags for nft_ctx Phil Sutter
2023-07-18 9:05 ` Thomas Haller
2023-07-18 9:33 ` Phil Sutter
2023-07-18 10:31 ` Thomas Haller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230714084943.1080757-3-thaller@redhat.com \
--to=thaller@redhat.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).