netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Subject: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: conntrack: simplify nf_conntrack_alter_reply
Date: Fri,  6 Oct 2023 11:27:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231006092755.2343-1-fw@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <netfilter-devel>

nf_conntrack_alter_reply doesn't do helper reassignment anymore.
Remove the comments that make this claim.

Furthermore, remove dead code from the function and place ot
in nf_conntrack.h.

Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
---
 include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h | 14 ++++++++++----
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c    | 18 ------------------
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.c  |  7 +------
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h
index 4085765c3370..cba3ccf03fcc 100644
--- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h
+++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h
@@ -160,10 +160,6 @@ static inline struct net *nf_ct_net(const struct nf_conn *ct)
 	return read_pnet(&ct->ct_net);
 }
 
-/* Alter reply tuple (maybe alter helper). */
-void nf_conntrack_alter_reply(struct nf_conn *ct,
-			      const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *newreply);
-
 /* Is this tuple taken? (ignoring any belonging to the given
    conntrack). */
 int nf_conntrack_tuple_taken(const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *tuple,
@@ -284,6 +280,16 @@ static inline bool nf_is_loopback_packet(const struct sk_buff *skb)
 	return skb->dev && skb->skb_iif && skb->dev->flags & IFF_LOOPBACK;
 }
 
+static inline void nf_conntrack_alter_reply(struct nf_conn *ct,
+					    const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *newreply)
+{
+	/* Must be unconfirmed, so not in hash table yet */
+	if (WARN_ON(nf_ct_is_confirmed(ct)))
+		return;
+
+	ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple = *newreply;
+}
+
 #define nfct_time_stamp ((u32)(jiffies))
 
 /* jiffies until ct expires, 0 if already expired */
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index 9f6f2e643575..124136b5a79a 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -2042,24 +2042,6 @@ nf_conntrack_in(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nf_hook_state *state)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_conntrack_in);
 
-/* Alter reply tuple (maybe alter helper).  This is for NAT, and is
-   implicitly racy: see __nf_conntrack_confirm */
-void nf_conntrack_alter_reply(struct nf_conn *ct,
-			      const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *newreply)
-{
-	struct nf_conn_help *help = nfct_help(ct);
-
-	/* Should be unconfirmed, so not in hash table yet */
-	WARN_ON(nf_ct_is_confirmed(ct));
-
-	nf_ct_dump_tuple(newreply);
-
-	ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple = *newreply;
-	if (ct->master || (help && !hlist_empty(&help->expectations)))
-		return;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_conntrack_alter_reply);
-
 /* Refresh conntrack for this many jiffies and do accounting if do_acct is 1 */
 void __nf_ct_refresh_acct(struct nf_conn *ct,
 			  enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo,
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.c
index f22691f83853..4ed5878cb25b 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.c
@@ -194,12 +194,7 @@ int __nf_ct_try_assign_helper(struct nf_conn *ct, struct nf_conn *tmpl,
 	struct nf_conntrack_helper *helper = NULL;
 	struct nf_conn_help *help;
 
-	/* We already got a helper explicitly attached. The function
-	 * nf_conntrack_alter_reply - in case NAT is in use - asks for looking
-	 * the helper up again. Since now the user is in full control of
-	 * making consistent helper configurations, skip this automatic
-	 * re-lookup, otherwise we'll lose the helper.
-	 */
+	/* We already got a helper explicitly attached (e.g. nft_ct) */
 	if (test_bit(IPS_HELPER_BIT, &ct->status))
 		return 0;
 
-- 
2.41.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-06  9:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <netfilter-devel>
2019-04-30 12:53 ` [PATCH nf] netfilter: nf_tables: fix oops during rule dump Florian Westphal
2019-05-01  3:54   ` Taehee Yoo
2019-05-20 19:21   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-09-06 15:20 ` [PATCH nf-next 0/2] netfilter: nat: avoid long-running loops Florian Westphal
2022-09-06 15:20   ` [PATCH nf-next 1/2] netfilter: nat: move repetitive nat port reserve loop to a helper Florian Westphal
2022-09-06 15:20   ` [PATCH nf-next 2/2] netfilter: nat: avoid long-running port range loop Florian Westphal
2023-10-06  9:27 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2025-07-23 15:00 ` [PATCH nft] parser_bison: fix memory leak when parsing flowtable hook declaration Florian Westphal
2025-07-24  9:44   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231006092755.2343-1-fw@strlen.de \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).