netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 4/7] netfilter: nf_nat: mask out non-verdict bits when checking return value
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 10:51:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231018085118.10829-5-fw@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231018085118.10829-1-fw@strlen.de>

Same as previous change: we need to mask out the non-verdict bits, as
upcoming patches may embed an errno value in NF_STOLEN verdicts too.

NF_DROP could already do this, but not all called functions do this.

Checks that only test ret vs NF_ACCEPT are fine, the 'errno parts'
are always 0 for those.

Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
---
 net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto.c b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto.c
index 5a049740758f..6d969468c779 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto.c
@@ -999,11 +999,12 @@ static unsigned int
 nf_nat_ipv6_in(void *priv, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	       const struct nf_hook_state *state)
 {
-	unsigned int ret;
+	unsigned int ret, verdict;
 	struct in6_addr daddr = ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr;
 
 	ret = nf_nat_ipv6_fn(priv, skb, state);
-	if (ret != NF_DROP && ret != NF_STOLEN &&
+	verdict = ret & NF_VERDICT_MASK;
+	if (verdict != NF_DROP && verdict != NF_STOLEN &&
 	    ipv6_addr_cmp(&daddr, &ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr))
 		skb_dst_drop(skb);
 
-- 
2.41.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-18  8:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-18  8:51 [PATCH net-next 0/7] netfilter updates for net-next Florian Westphal
2023-10-18  8:51 ` [PATCH net-next 1/7] netfilter: xt_mangle: only check verdict part of return value Florian Westphal
2023-10-18 10:10   ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-10-18  8:51 ` [PATCH net-next 2/7] netfilter: nf_tables: mask out non-verdict bits when checking " Florian Westphal
2023-10-18  8:51 ` [PATCH net-next 3/7] netfilter: conntrack: convert nf_conntrack_update to netfilter verdicts Florian Westphal
2023-10-18  8:51 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2023-10-18  8:51 ` [PATCH net-next 5/7] netfilter: make nftables drops visible in net dropmonitor Florian Westphal
2023-10-18  8:51 ` [PATCH net-next 6/7] netfilter: bridge: convert br_netfilter to NF_DROP_REASON Florian Westphal
2023-10-18  8:51 ` [PATCH net-next 7/7] netfilter: nf_tables: de-constify set commit ops function argument Florian Westphal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231018085118.10829-5-fw@strlen.de \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).