From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fw@strlen.de
Subject: [PATCH net-next 06/19] br_netfilter: use single forward hook for ip and arp
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 23:25:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231025212555.132775-7-pablo@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231025212555.132775-1-pablo@netfilter.org>
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
br_netfilter registers two forward hooks, one for ip and one for arp.
Just use a common function for both and then call the arp/ip helper
as needed.
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---
net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
index 4c0c9f838f5c..6adcb45bca75 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
@@ -570,18 +570,12 @@ static int br_nf_forward_finish(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff
}
-/* This is the 'purely bridged' case. For IP, we pass the packet to
- * netfilter with indev and outdev set to the bridge device,
- * but we are still able to filter on the 'real' indev/outdev
- * because of the physdev module. For ARP, indev and outdev are the
- * bridge ports. */
-static unsigned int br_nf_forward_ip(void *priv,
- struct sk_buff *skb,
- const struct nf_hook_state *state)
+static unsigned int br_nf_forward_ip(struct sk_buff *skb,
+ const struct nf_hook_state *state,
+ u8 pf)
{
struct nf_bridge_info *nf_bridge;
struct net_device *parent;
- u_int8_t pf;
nf_bridge = nf_bridge_info_get(skb);
if (!nf_bridge)
@@ -600,15 +594,6 @@ static unsigned int br_nf_forward_ip(void *priv,
if (!parent)
return NF_DROP_REASON(skb, SKB_DROP_REASON_DEV_READY, 0);
- if (IS_IP(skb) || is_vlan_ip(skb, state->net) ||
- is_pppoe_ip(skb, state->net))
- pf = NFPROTO_IPV4;
- else if (IS_IPV6(skb) || is_vlan_ipv6(skb, state->net) ||
- is_pppoe_ipv6(skb, state->net))
- pf = NFPROTO_IPV6;
- else
- return NF_ACCEPT;
-
nf_bridge_pull_encap_header(skb);
if (skb->pkt_type == PACKET_OTHERHOST) {
@@ -620,19 +605,18 @@ static unsigned int br_nf_forward_ip(void *priv,
if (br_validate_ipv4(state->net, skb))
return NF_DROP_REASON(skb, SKB_DROP_REASON_IP_INHDR, 0);
IPCB(skb)->frag_max_size = nf_bridge->frag_max_size;
- }
-
- if (pf == NFPROTO_IPV6) {
+ skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_IP);
+ } else if (pf == NFPROTO_IPV6) {
if (br_validate_ipv6(state->net, skb))
return NF_DROP_REASON(skb, SKB_DROP_REASON_IP_INHDR, 0);
IP6CB(skb)->frag_max_size = nf_bridge->frag_max_size;
+ skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_IPV6);
+ } else {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ return NF_DROP;
}
nf_bridge->physoutdev = skb->dev;
- if (pf == NFPROTO_IPV4)
- skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_IP);
- else
- skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_IPV6);
NF_HOOK(pf, NF_INET_FORWARD, state->net, NULL, skb,
brnf_get_logical_dev(skb, state->in, state->net),
@@ -641,8 +625,7 @@ static unsigned int br_nf_forward_ip(void *priv,
return NF_STOLEN;
}
-static unsigned int br_nf_forward_arp(void *priv,
- struct sk_buff *skb,
+static unsigned int br_nf_forward_arp(struct sk_buff *skb,
const struct nf_hook_state *state)
{
struct net_bridge_port *p;
@@ -659,11 +642,8 @@ static unsigned int br_nf_forward_arp(void *priv,
if (!brnet->call_arptables && !br_opt_get(br, BROPT_NF_CALL_ARPTABLES))
return NF_ACCEPT;
- if (!IS_ARP(skb)) {
- if (!is_vlan_arp(skb, state->net))
- return NF_ACCEPT;
+ if (is_vlan_arp(skb, state->net))
nf_bridge_pull_encap_header(skb);
- }
if (unlikely(!pskb_may_pull(skb, sizeof(struct arphdr))))
return NF_DROP_REASON(skb, SKB_DROP_REASON_PKT_TOO_SMALL, 0);
@@ -680,6 +660,28 @@ static unsigned int br_nf_forward_arp(void *priv,
return NF_STOLEN;
}
+/* This is the 'purely bridged' case. For IP, we pass the packet to
+ * netfilter with indev and outdev set to the bridge device,
+ * but we are still able to filter on the 'real' indev/outdev
+ * because of the physdev module. For ARP, indev and outdev are the
+ * bridge ports.
+ */
+static unsigned int br_nf_forward(void *priv,
+ struct sk_buff *skb,
+ const struct nf_hook_state *state)
+{
+ if (IS_IP(skb) || is_vlan_ip(skb, state->net) ||
+ is_pppoe_ip(skb, state->net))
+ return br_nf_forward_ip(skb, state, NFPROTO_IPV4);
+ if (IS_IPV6(skb) || is_vlan_ipv6(skb, state->net) ||
+ is_pppoe_ipv6(skb, state->net))
+ return br_nf_forward_ip(skb, state, NFPROTO_IPV6);
+ if (IS_ARP(skb) || is_vlan_arp(skb, state->net))
+ return br_nf_forward_arp(skb, state);
+
+ return NF_ACCEPT;
+}
+
static int br_nf_push_frag_xmit(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct brnf_frag_data *data;
@@ -937,13 +939,7 @@ static const struct nf_hook_ops br_nf_ops[] = {
.priority = NF_BR_PRI_BRNF,
},
{
- .hook = br_nf_forward_ip,
- .pf = NFPROTO_BRIDGE,
- .hooknum = NF_BR_FORWARD,
- .priority = NF_BR_PRI_BRNF - 1,
- },
- {
- .hook = br_nf_forward_arp,
+ .hook = br_nf_forward,
.pf = NFPROTO_BRIDGE,
.hooknum = NF_BR_FORWARD,
.priority = NF_BR_PRI_BRNF,
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-25 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-25 21:25 [PATCH net-next 00/19] Netfilter updates for net-next Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-10-25 21:25 ` [PATCH net-next 01/19] netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: rename gc deactivate+erase function Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-10-26 13:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-10-25 21:25 ` [PATCH net-next 02/19] netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: prefer sync gc to async worker Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-11-03 17:34 ` Simon Horman
2023-11-03 17:55 ` Florian Westphal
2023-10-25 21:25 ` [PATCH net-next 03/19] netfilter: nf_tables: Open-code audit log call in nf_tables_getrule() Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-10-25 21:25 ` [PATCH net-next 04/19] netfilter: nf_tables: Introduce nf_tables_getrule_single() Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-10-25 21:25 ` [PATCH net-next 05/19] netfilter: nf_tables: Add locking for NFT_MSG_GETRULE_RESET requests Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-10-25 21:25 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2023-10-25 21:25 ` [PATCH net-next 07/19] netfilter: conntrack: switch connlabels to atomic_t Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-10-25 21:25 ` [PATCH net-next 08/19] netfilter: nf_tables: Drop pointless memset in nf_tables_dump_obj Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-10-25 21:25 ` [PATCH net-next 09/19] netfilter: nf_tables: Unconditionally allocate nft_obj_filter Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-10-25 21:25 ` [PATCH net-next 10/19] netfilter: nf_tables: A better name for nft_obj_filter Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-10-25 21:25 ` [PATCH net-next 11/19] netfilter: nf_tables: Carry s_idx in nft_obj_dump_ctx Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-10-25 21:25 ` [PATCH net-next 12/19] netfilter: nf_tables: nft_obj_filter fits into cb->ctx Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-10-25 21:25 ` [PATCH net-next 13/19] netfilter: nf_tables: Carry reset boolean in nft_obj_dump_ctx Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-10-25 21:25 ` [PATCH net-next 14/19] netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: no need to call pipapo_deactivate() from flush Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-10-25 21:25 ` [PATCH net-next 15/19] netfilter: nf_tables: set backend .flush always succeeds Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-10-25 21:25 ` [PATCH net-next 16/19] netfilter: nf_tables: expose opaque set element as struct nft_elem_priv Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-10-25 21:25 ` [PATCH net-next 17/19] netfilter: nf_tables: shrink memory consumption of set elements Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-10-25 21:25 ` [PATCH net-next 18/19] netfilter: nf_tables: set->ops->insert returns opaque set element in case of EEXIST Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-10-25 21:25 ` [PATCH net-next 19/19] netfilter: nf_tables: Carry reset boolean in nft_set_dump_ctx Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231025212555.132775-7-pablo@netfilter.org \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).