From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Thomas Haller <thaller@redhat.com>
Cc: "Florian Westphal" <fw@strlen.de>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
"Maciej Żenczykowski" <zenczykowski@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 nft] parser: tcpopt: fix tcp option parsing with NUM + length field
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 13:16:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231206121653.GH8352@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9d11bf95bd1b07e15cd7160ab310794ea5d4b8b0.camel@redhat.com>
Thomas Haller <thaller@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Instead, feed the json-nft file to nft, then do a normal list-
> > ruleset,
> > then compare that vs. normal .nft file.
>
> The .nft and .json-nft files are all fed back into `nft --check -f`. So
> that is happening too.
Not really, this checks that the parser eats the input.
> It will also comparing the raw files (after sanitize+prettify), which
> is closer to the original thing that is supposed to be tested. That is
> why it's done.
"metainfo": {
- "json_schema_version": 1,
+ "version": "VERSION",
"release_name": "RELEASE_NAME",
- "version": "VERSION"
+ "json_schema_version": 1
}
},
i.e. it fails validation because the on-record file has a different
layout/ordering than what is expected.
But if you feed it into nft, nft list ruleset will generate the expected
(non-json) output.
> What issues do you mean? I don't see any. Did you test/review the two
> patches?
The first one is applied. The second one I applied locally.
But its still picky about the formatting.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-06 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-05 11:56 [PATCH v2 nft] parser: tcpopt: fix tcp option parsing with NUM + length field Florian Westphal
2023-12-05 12:07 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-12-05 12:20 ` Florian Westphal
2023-12-05 12:50 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-12-05 13:14 ` Florian Westphal
2023-12-05 14:10 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-12-06 7:58 ` Thomas Haller
2023-12-06 11:38 ` Florian Westphal
2023-12-06 11:50 ` Thomas Haller
2023-12-06 11:59 ` Florian Westphal
2023-12-06 12:04 ` Florian Westphal
2023-12-06 12:09 ` Thomas Haller
2023-12-06 12:16 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2023-12-06 13:22 ` Thomas Haller
2023-12-06 13:24 ` Florian Westphal
2023-12-06 14:56 ` Thomas Haller
2023-12-06 14:19 ` Phil Sutter
2023-12-06 15:12 ` Thomas Haller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231206121653.GH8352@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thaller@redhat.com \
--cc=zenczykowski@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).