From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nft 0/3] src: make set-merging less zealous
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 11:11:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231216101141.GA23061@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231213170650.13451-1-fw@strlen.de>
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> wrote:
> I got a large corpus of various crashes in the set internals code
> tripping over expressions that should not exist, e.g. a range expression
> with a symbolic expression.
>
> From initial investigation it looks like to root cause is the same,
> we have back-to-back declarations of the same set name, evaluation
> is returning errors, but we instist to continue evaluation.
>
> Then, we try to merge set elements and end up merging
> such a 'redefined set' with an erroneous one.
>
> This series adds an initial assertion which helped to make
> crashes easier to backtrace.
>
> Second patch adds a 'errors' flag to struct set and raises
> it once we saw soemthing funky.
>
> Patch 3 also sets/uses this when evaluating the set itself.
>
> Alternative would be to make the lowlevel code more robust
> of these kinds of issues, but that might take a while
> to fix, also because this oce is partially not able to
> indicate errors.
We need to rewrite it, its too picky:
nft add rule t c ip protocol . th dport { tcp . 22, udp . 1 }
nft add rule t c ip protocol . th dport { tcp / 22, udp . 1 }
nft add rule t c ip protocol . th dport { tcp / 22 }
In particular, there is a lot of strange code that causes
this to be evaluated in very different ways.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-16 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-13 17:06 [PATCH nft 0/3] src: make set-merging less zealous Florian Westphal
2023-12-13 17:06 ` [PATCH nft 1/3] intervals: BUG on prefix expressions without value Florian Westphal
2023-12-13 17:06 ` [PATCH nft 2/3] src: do not merge a set with a erroneous one Florian Westphal
2023-12-13 17:06 ` [PATCH nft 3/3] evaluate: don't assert if set->data is NULL Florian Westphal
2023-12-16 10:11 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231216101141.GA23061@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).