netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>, Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iptables] extensions: libebt_stp: fix range checking
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:42:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240124154216.GD31645@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZbElUwojpsHjxnGO@orbyte.nwl.cc>

Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc> wrote:
> While you correctly hate the game instead of its player, you probably
> hate the wrong game: The code above indeed is confusing. Maybe one
> should move that monotonicity check into libxtables which should
> simplify it quite a bit. I'll have a look. :)

Something IS broken.  Still not working on FC 39 test machine
even after fresh clone.

On a "working" VM:
export XTABLES_LIBDIR=$(pwd)/extensions
iptables/xtables-nft-multi ebtables -A INPUT --stp-root-cost 1
have 1 32765

@@ -150,7 +151,9 @@ static void brstp_parse(struct xt_option_call *cb)
                RANGE_ASSIGN("root-prio", root_prio, cb->val.u16_range);
                break;
        case O_RCOST:
+               fprintf(stderr, "have %u %u\n", cb->val.u32_range[0], cb->val.u32_range[1]);

I can't even figure out where the correct max value is supposed to be set.

Varying the input:

xtables-nft-multi ebtables -A INPUT --stp-root-cost 1
have 1 32764

Looks to me as if the upper value is undefined.

Other users of *RC versions handle it in .parse, e.g. libxt_length.
No idea how this is working.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-24 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-23 16:49 [PATCH iptables] extensions: libebt_stp: fix range checking Florian Westphal
2024-01-24 14:00 ` Phil Sutter
2024-01-24 14:37   ` Florian Westphal
2024-01-24 14:57     ` Phil Sutter
2024-01-24 15:42       ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2024-01-24 16:13         ` Phil Sutter
2024-01-25 14:44           ` Phil Sutter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240124154216.GD31645@breakpoint.cc \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phil@nwl.cc \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).