From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>, Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iptables] extensions: libebt_stp: fix range checking
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:42:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240124154216.GD31645@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZbElUwojpsHjxnGO@orbyte.nwl.cc>
Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc> wrote:
> While you correctly hate the game instead of its player, you probably
> hate the wrong game: The code above indeed is confusing. Maybe one
> should move that monotonicity check into libxtables which should
> simplify it quite a bit. I'll have a look. :)
Something IS broken. Still not working on FC 39 test machine
even after fresh clone.
On a "working" VM:
export XTABLES_LIBDIR=$(pwd)/extensions
iptables/xtables-nft-multi ebtables -A INPUT --stp-root-cost 1
have 1 32765
@@ -150,7 +151,9 @@ static void brstp_parse(struct xt_option_call *cb)
RANGE_ASSIGN("root-prio", root_prio, cb->val.u16_range);
break;
case O_RCOST:
+ fprintf(stderr, "have %u %u\n", cb->val.u32_range[0], cb->val.u32_range[1]);
I can't even figure out where the correct max value is supposed to be set.
Varying the input:
xtables-nft-multi ebtables -A INPUT --stp-root-cost 1
have 1 32764
Looks to me as if the upper value is undefined.
Other users of *RC versions handle it in .parse, e.g. libxt_length.
No idea how this is working.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-24 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-23 16:49 [PATCH iptables] extensions: libebt_stp: fix range checking Florian Westphal
2024-01-24 14:00 ` Phil Sutter
2024-01-24 14:37 ` Florian Westphal
2024-01-24 14:57 ` Phil Sutter
2024-01-24 15:42 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2024-01-24 16:13 ` Phil Sutter
2024-01-25 14:44 ` Phil Sutter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240124154216.GD31645@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).