netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fw@strlen.de
Subject: [PATCH net 3/6] netfilter: conntrack: check SCTP_CID_SHUTDOWN_ACK for vtag setting in sctp_new
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 23:59:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240131225943.7536-4-pablo@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240131225943.7536-1-pablo@netfilter.org>

From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>

The annotation says in sctp_new(): "If it is a shutdown ack OOTB packet, we
expect a return shutdown complete, otherwise an ABORT Sec 8.4 (5) and (8)".
However, it does not check SCTP_CID_SHUTDOWN_ACK before setting vtag[REPLY]
in the conntrack entry(ct).

Because of that, if the ct in Router disappears for some reason in [1]
with the packet sequence like below:

   Client > Server: sctp (1) [INIT] [init tag: 3201533963]
   Server > Client: sctp (1) [INIT ACK] [init tag: 972498433]
   Client > Server: sctp (1) [COOKIE ECHO]
   Server > Client: sctp (1) [COOKIE ACK]
   Client > Server: sctp (1) [DATA] (B)(E) [TSN: 3075057809]
   Server > Client: sctp (1) [SACK] [cum ack 3075057809]
   Server > Client: sctp (1) [HB REQ]
   (the ct in Router disappears somehow)  <-------- [1]
   Client > Server: sctp (1) [HB ACK]
   Client > Server: sctp (1) [DATA] (B)(E) [TSN: 3075057810]
   Client > Server: sctp (1) [DATA] (B)(E) [TSN: 3075057810]
   Client > Server: sctp (1) [HB REQ]
   Client > Server: sctp (1) [DATA] (B)(E) [TSN: 3075057810]
   Client > Server: sctp (1) [HB REQ]
   Client > Server: sctp (1) [ABORT]

when processing HB ACK packet in Router it calls sctp_new() to initialize
the new ct with vtag[REPLY] set to HB_ACK packet's vtag.

Later when sending DATA from Client, all the SACKs from Server will get
dropped in Router, as the SACK packet's vtag does not match vtag[REPLY]
in the ct. The worst thing is the vtag in this ct will never get fixed
by the upcoming packets from Server.

This patch fixes it by checking SCTP_CID_SHUTDOWN_ACK before setting
vtag[REPLY] in the ct in sctp_new() as the annotation says. With this
fix, it will leave vtag[REPLY] in ct to 0 in the case above, and the
next HB REQ/ACK from Server is able to fix the vtag as its value is 0
in nf_conntrack_sctp_packet().

Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c
index c6bd533983c1..4cc97f971264 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ sctp_new(struct nf_conn *ct, const struct sk_buff *skb,
 			pr_debug("Setting vtag %x for secondary conntrack\n",
 				 sh->vtag);
 			ct->proto.sctp.vtag[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL] = sh->vtag;
-		} else {
+		} else if (sch->type == SCTP_CID_SHUTDOWN_ACK) {
 		/* If it is a shutdown ack OOTB packet, we expect a return
 		   shutdown complete, otherwise an ABORT Sec 8.4 (5) and (8) */
 			pr_debug("Setting vtag %x for new conn OOTB\n",
-- 
2.30.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-31 22:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-31 22:59 [PATCH net 0/6] Netfilter fixes for net Pablo Neira Ayuso
2024-01-31 22:59 ` [PATCH net 1/6] netfilter: conntrack: correct window scaling with retransmitted SYN Pablo Neira Ayuso
2024-02-01 17:20   ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2024-01-31 22:59 ` [PATCH net 2/6] netfilter: nf_tables: restrict tunnel object to NFPROTO_NETDEV Pablo Neira Ayuso
2024-01-31 22:59 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2024-01-31 22:59 ` [PATCH net 4/6] netfilter: ipset: fix performance regression in swap operation Pablo Neira Ayuso
2024-01-31 22:59 ` [PATCH net 5/6] netfilter: nf_log: replace BUG_ON by WARN_ON_ONCE when putting logger Pablo Neira Ayuso
2024-01-31 22:59 ` [PATCH net 6/6] netfilter: nft_ct: sanitize layer 3 and 4 protocol number in custom expectations Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240131225943.7536-4-pablo@netfilter.org \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).