From: Kyle Swenson <kyle.swenson@est.tech>
To: Kyle Swenson <kyle.swenson@est.tech>,
"netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org"
<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "fw@strlen.de" <fw@strlen.de>,
"pablo@netfilter.org" <pablo@netfilter.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3] netfilter: nat: restore default DNAT behavior
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 23:56:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240208235612.3112936-1-kyle.swenson@est.tech> (raw)
When a DNAT rule is configured via iptables with different port ranges,
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -d 10.0.0.2 -m tcp --dport 32000:32010
-j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.0.10:21000-21010
we seem to be DNATing to some random port on the LAN side. While this is
expected if --random is passed to the iptables command, it is not
expected without passing --random. The expected behavior (and the
observed behavior prior to the commit in the "Fixes" tag) is the traffic
will be DNAT'd to 192.168.0.10:21000 unless there is a tuple collision
with that destination. In that case, we expect the traffic to be
instead DNAT'd to 192.168.0.10:21001, so on so forth until the end of
the range.
This patch intends to restore the behavior observed prior to the "Fixes"
tag.
Fixes: 6ed5943f8735 ("netfilter: nat: remove l4 protocol port rovers")
Signed-off-by: Kyle Swenson <kyle.swenson@est.tech>
---
net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c
index c3d7ecbc777c..016c816d91cb 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c
@@ -549,12 +549,15 @@ static void nf_nat_l4proto_unique_tuple(struct nf_conntrack_tuple *tuple,
}
find_free_id:
if (range->flags & NF_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_OFFSET)
off = (ntohs(*keyptr) - ntohs(range->base_proto.all));
- else
+ else if ((range->flags & NF_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_RANDOM_ALL) ||
+ maniptype != NF_NAT_MANIP_DST)
off = get_random_u16();
+ else
+ off = 0;
attempts = range_size;
if (attempts > NF_NAT_MAX_ATTEMPTS)
attempts = NF_NAT_MAX_ATTEMPTS;
--
2.43.0
reply other threads:[~2024-02-08 23:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240208235612.3112936-1-kyle.swenson@est.tech \
--to=kyle.swenson@est.tech \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).