From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68141629 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2024 00:10:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731024642; cv=none; b=V+hkba2iOS8vOGCkVZpJ5iTAkS96W0vEW+thmuvqojwCSZokhztsCivWuc/b7A/N3wjRz2J5J7fe0vMBXx9jngljmYdgIBuaMbUNZ2fRUk397vIMen8LN7YME4AU3b9/CgyXaxXkeK5+UQbNu8MdUGF62RsMB77u6aj8XYsptPU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731024642; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oz0Kbp4MCkiGsbN1VoVn3BR02sk9JjCagSuI4ET2614=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=J7+zttFuuZy+L1quDPAwcxDphED4te8lX0878ugIErKVXgzJSgwkw7471zHmMEygTlIy6va2Oxa6FsILyS5Dz++H522VW1tGMzMgoMHtZs4ytXvrEHcCdNbjY/fRFJa2lXlPXVR9CYY6WxqgQfQwwPoi/1+3nYq4TRVD2WM58GA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=mHfl09Ei; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="mHfl09Ei" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1731024640; x=1762560640; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=oz0Kbp4MCkiGsbN1VoVn3BR02sk9JjCagSuI4ET2614=; b=mHfl09EiaBQ0cm7CF9Mq3wbiW4ZkkQS8+kScCZZpOZ68icWP40lh2TGW 8T3vHyvxwUFQByaUzrx237iCk1yQYlvyZAqG/vs+PBU4J3Jtl1KoOmOu3 Jo34jX9Yb5fvlTd53IZ8EZDj7DfQxce/4zz9NDWfMggOug0abTIqim+S1 1WTx9iaaxd9DNMmFzkXQf2IbGAL4/nzSCxzG5MOUfD8y9MoktgU9z3dFc bgmn/GxkcCz+xRATmFC2AEBfmnG3sMEnZx1zp1fghupyOXCEHOTD/6V8c T+kuRNwcbnhLO7EHmxnhg/1DCYKduLd1RDh95k5SjHycQYke90U1heURw Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 0OiGTjVdS2+EKKlraOADXQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: mnM/eRQLTMueB6yqhBNaoA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11249"; a="41495777" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,136,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="41495777" Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Nov 2024 16:10:40 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: WhoXpdTaRcKQsRRqLX2csg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: NwmjCmU8TwSHw5tFwINjqQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,136,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="122799433" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO a48cf1aa22e8) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Nov 2024 16:10:38 -0800 Received: from kbuild by a48cf1aa22e8 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1t9CaC-000qoG-0Z; Fri, 08 Nov 2024 00:10:36 +0000 Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 08:09:41 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Florian Westphal , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Florian Westphal , Nadia Pinaeva , Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: conntrack: add conntrack event timestamp Message-ID: <202411080731.bDRRTgah-lkp@intel.com> References: <20241107194117.32116-1-fw@strlen.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241107194117.32116-1-fw@strlen.de> Hi Florian, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on netfilter-nf/main] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.12-rc6 next-20241107] [cannot apply to nf-next/master horms-ipvs/master] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Florian-Westphal/netfilter-conntrack-add-conntrack-event-timestamp/20241108-034444 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf.git main patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241107194117.32116-1-fw%40strlen.de patch subject: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: conntrack: add conntrack event timestamp config: x86_64-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241108/202411080731.bDRRTgah-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-12) 11.3.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241108/202411080731.bDRRTgah-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411080731.bDRRTgah-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c:386:1: warning: 'ctnetlink_dump_event_timestamp' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 386 | ctnetlink_dump_event_timestamp(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nf_conn *ct) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/ctnetlink_dump_event_timestamp +386 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c 384 385 static int > 386 ctnetlink_dump_event_timestamp(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nf_conn *ct) 387 { 388 #ifdef CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_TIMESTAMP 389 const struct nf_conntrack_ecache *e = nf_ct_ecache_find(ct); 390 391 if (e) { 392 u64 ts = local64_read(&e->timestamp); 393 394 if (ts) 395 return nla_put_be64(skb, CTA_TIMESTAMP_EVENT, 396 cpu_to_be64(ts), CTA_TIMESTAMP_PAD); 397 } 398 #endif 399 return 0; 400 } 401 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki