From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 980812E540E; Thu, 17 Jul 2025 13:23:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752758620; cv=none; b=QSjvGArQH3g4cEwKv4guKviEL8OPZUyQjPOjhUd/58ANJcC4axzxmU0oIBmRQYplFePa/pB83/J1mLN6MOntC2tUAkFTctpUg0nAgsFvlvBRve0v4600Ee1zSgcRdkjA6pi2HYTUpVhNGEBYhsGX8zmRwRztbDj1del6TaDDhfM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752758620; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mx50udsOrY4nJPMx/5UO61lbKUIUfTH0aOk0LIinwV4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=tjLpq5Q5tsUAg9mpGGFDyRsDNQBP4hyGhnjSXYkpo3zhkAVHNc0cswG+UyGl0+ibk45AyS6N0T011MWixVC9pqyh50Zw0rok7XQusLzMms4YeNsHk4DFBsJqUhsDfqmCoUajK0hf/YIibsLtEkPwp+xr3DXxAEFJ6+xz4ATBVEQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=LxXAauIz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="LxXAauIz" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BFD82C4CEE3; Thu, 17 Jul 2025 13:23:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1752758620; bh=mx50udsOrY4nJPMx/5UO61lbKUIUfTH0aOk0LIinwV4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=LxXAauIz0QShsLSZoVEwvtUCG9wn71iRWgX71iSUEnoa105FTe61ZLRJaXByv7Ezh 58mTHqVB52FdkJvx9wsZR4NLTwDFuH6qKOpQnOwOgjoWv5vyctgmU+rf47waLh6d6m RJ8wR7IP5tOf54Y9kp8xbILo26PwUJnqXYEfo9PcUJIJuekLfnLWl4Fmd/uGMvXdzj WJNOOAt7j0WLW9sfOvnl7L9jymujSKoIpHH+9H2I8JkNTLXr1Xo7Og8zTvWYiFqOl4 rdQhuOg8f/KzJH+DyRRFEkWX5VlcR5GonZoOv6S8tbwly62tLI2trySmmkZmka27BD +yfNP7DCbDVsw== Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 06:23:38 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Florian Westphal Cc: Paolo Abeni , Pablo Neira Ayuso , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, horms@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net,v2 0/7] Netfilter fixes for net Message-ID: <20250717062338.18ed7f69@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20250717095808.41725-1-pablo@netfilter.org> <33ce1182-00fa-4255-b51c-d4dc927071bc@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 15:01:53 +0200 Florian Westphal wrote: > Paolo Abeni wrote: > > The first run of the newly introduced conntrack_clash.sh test failed on > > nipa: > > > > # timeout set to 1800 > > # selftests: net/netfilter: conntrack_clash.sh > > # got 128 of 128 replies > > # timed out while waiting for reply from thread > > # got 127 of 128 replies > > # FAIL: did not receive expected number of replies for 10.0.1.99:22111 > > # FAIL: clash resolution test for 10.0.1.99:22111 on attempt 2 > > # got 128 of 128 replies > > # timed out while waiting for reply from thread > > # got 0 of 128 replies > > # FAIL: did not receive expected number of replies for 127.0.0.1:9001 > > # FAIL: clash resolution test for 127.0.0.1:9001 on attempt 2 > > # SKIP: Clash resolution did not trigger > > not ok 1 selftests: net/netfilter: conntrack_clash.sh # exit=1 > > I think the above should not block the PR, but please have a look. > > No idea whats happening, I get 100/100 ok :-/ > > I'll send a revert or $ksft_skip for now if I can't figure it out. Oh, I see this disembodied thread now, sorry. No need to send the skip, we can ignore the case when ingesting results.