From: Yu Junzhe <junzheyu1@gmail.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>, Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org
Subject: [BUG] netfilter: nf_tables_netdev_event UAF of JUMP binding chain
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 06:38:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260924063821.573-1-junzheyu1@gmail.com> (raw)
Hello,
I am reporting a slab use-after-free in nf_tables_netdev_event(): deleting
a netdev hooked by an nftables ingress base chain can free a binding-chain
successor while the notifier is still walking table->chains. Triggering it
requires CAP_NET_ADMIN (including in a network namespace). I do not claim
privilege escalation; the result we see is local DoS (KASAN slab UAF read).
Summary
=======
nf_tables_netdev_event() walks table->chains with list_for_each_entry_safe.
On NETDEV_UNREGISTER it releases the netdev ingress base chain. A JUMP to an
NFT_CHAIN_BINDING successor is deactivated (nft_chain_del + bound = false)
and then nft_immediate_destroy() kfree's that successor. The walker's saved
nr still points at the freed nft_chain, so the loop increment reads
chain->list.next.
The deactivate/destroy path:
__nft_release_basechain_now()
-> nft_rule_expr_deactivate(..., NFT_TRANS_RELEASE)
-> nft_immediate_deactivate(): nft_chain_del(chain); chain->bound = false;
-> nft_immediate_destroy(): nf_tables_chain_destroy() when !chain->bound
list_for_each_entry_safe only protects deleting the current entry, not a
sibling freed inside the loop body.
Affected
========
- Confirmed on Linux 6.6.144, KASAN guest.
- Files: net/netfilter/nft_chain_filter.c, net/netfilter/nft_immediate.c,
net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
- Config: CONFIG_NF_TABLES=y, CONFIG_NF_TABLES_NETDEV=y, CONFIG_BRIDGE=y
(KASAN used for the report)
- Source review of torvalds/linux master as of 2026-09-18:
nft_immediate_deactivate() still unlinks binding chains on NFT_TRANS_RELEASE
and nft_immediate_destroy() still destroys them when !chain->bound.
__nft_release_basechain() is gone from nf_tables_api.c and the notifier
only unregisters hooks on tip, so this PoC's live RTM_DELLINK trigger was
not re-run on tip.
Ruleset that triggers it
========================
table netdev t {
chain in {
type filter hook ingress device "br0" priority 0;
jump j
}
chain j {
flags binding;
}
}
Create br0 in a network namespace, load the ruleset, then RTM_DELLINK br0
while the namespace is still alive (NETDEV_UNREGISTER). Netns teardown alone
is too late: nft pernet exit wins that race.
Crash excerpt (minimized PoC, Linux 6.6.144 KASAN)
==================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in nf_tables_netdev_event+0x699/0x7d0
Read of size 8 at addr ff11000009aefd20 by task repro/220
CPU: 0 PID: 220 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.6.144 #1
Call Trace:
kasan_report
nf_tables_netdev_event+0x699/0x7d0
notifier_call_chain
unregister_netdevice_many_notify
rtnl_dellink
rtnetlink_rcv_msg
Allocated by task 220:
nf_tables_addchain
nf_tables_newchain
Freed by task 220:
nf_tables_chain_destroy
nft_immediate_destroy
__nft_release_basechain_now
__nft_release_basechain
nf_tables_netdev_event+0x63a/0x7d0
The KASAN read is 8 bytes at offset 32 of a kmalloc-128 object (nft_chain.list).
Reproducer
==========
A self-contained C PoC (raw NETLINK_NETFILTER batch plus RTM_NEWLINK/
RTM_DELLINK, no nft binary) and a Docker/QEMU package are available on
request. VM-only: the program triggers a guest KASAN UAF. Please do not run
it on a host kernel.
I am happy to test patches or send the reproducer.
Thanks,
Yu Junzhe
FuzzAnything <fuzzanything@gmail.com>
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-24 6:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 6:38 Yu Junzhe [this message]
2026-09-24 7:05 ` [BUG] netfilter: nf_tables_netdev_event UAF of JUMP binding chain Florian Westphal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260924063821.573-1-junzheyu1@gmail.com \
--to=junzheyu1@gmail.com \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox