From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fred Leeflang Subject: nflog_bind_group() question Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 11:44:12 +0100 Message-ID: <30defc5b0912010244i385afe45gac6bc521c19a75da@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: vuurmuur-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail-pw0-f42.google.com ([209.85.160.42]:46705 "EHLO mail-pw0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753374AbZLAKoG (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Dec 2009 05:44:06 -0500 Received: by pwi3 with SMTP id 3so2473572pwi.21 for ; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 02:44:13 -0800 (PST) Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi devs, We've recently implemented NFLOG support in vuurmuur, I've written an article on the effort here http://wordpress.3dn.nl/2009/11/25/iptabes-nflog-support-in-vuurmuur/ I'm curious about something I found out in the process. I've had ulogd2 running alongside vuurmuur for a while and configured it to listen to a specific nflog-group. When I had ulogd2 running I would not be able to run vuurmuur_log which also listens to an nflog-group. It took me a while to realize that it would not work because of having ulogd2 running and both trying to listen to the SAME nflog-group. Does this mean that it's not possible for two applications at the same time to get netfilter_log messages from the same nflog-group? -Fred