From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Giant Sand Fan's" Subject: ip_route_me_harder question Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 18:19:49 +0100 Message-ID: <417f50830901070919u7c90ac16x5771bece809568e4@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.152]:3897 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752388AbZAGRTv (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2009 12:19:51 -0500 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so3054292fgg.17 for ; Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:19:49 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, I have a netfilter module that needs to reroute a packet after unpacking it (minimal encap) in NF_IP_PRE_ROUTING, because the dst changes. But even when a ip_route_me_harder with RTN_LOCAL works (ret==0) the packet disappears. The question is , do i need to use ip_route_me_harder? because when the dst of encapsulated packet is the local machine it works. thanks. -- Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html