netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Pablo Neira <pablo@eurodev.net>
Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kill NFC_* stuff in iptables [was Re: iptables compile error: NFC_IP_TOS undeclared]
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 02:32:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <420D5CC8.1060600@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <420D27DB.9000608@eurodev.net>

Pablo Neira wrote:

> Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>> Why didn't you remove it entirely instead ?
>
> true :), patch attached. I've gzip'ed it, it's too big for sending it 
> in clear text.

Thanks a lot. Hopeing I don't annoy you .. I haven't actually checked
the API, but can't we remove all those now empty init functions ?
If not I think it would be nicer to change the API to check for
->init == NULL instead of leaving all these empty funtion bodies around.

> Next step, what do you think about removing nfcache passed as 
> parameter from the iptables API?

I don't think we can remove it from struct ipt_entry without
breaking userspace compatibility. But we could stop using it.

Regards
Patrick

  reply	other threads:[~2005-02-12  1:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-02-08  7:50 netfilter & ipv6 Jonas Berlin
2005-02-10 14:07 ` Jonas Berlin
2005-02-10 14:41   ` Samuel Jean
2005-02-10 15:10     ` iptables compile error: NFC_IP_TOS undeclared Alexander Piavka
2005-02-10 15:18       ` Jonas Berlin
2005-02-10 16:00         ` Alexander Piavka
2005-02-10 16:04           ` Jonas Berlin
2005-02-10 17:50             ` Patrick McHardy
2005-02-10 23:16               ` [PATCH] kill NFC_* stuff in iptables [was Re: iptables compile error: NFC_IP_TOS undeclared] Pablo Neira
2005-02-11 19:07                 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-02-11 21:47                   ` Pablo Neira
2005-02-12  1:32                     ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2005-02-12 22:25                       ` Pablo Neira
2005-02-12 23:34                         ` Patrick McHardy
2005-02-10 17:20     ` netfilter & ipv6 Jonas Berlin
2005-02-10 21:36   ` Sven-Haegar Koch
2005-02-15  1:29     ` Jonas Berlin
     [not found] ` <53965.213.236.112.75.1107867276.squirrel@213.236.112.75>
2005-02-10 23:15   ` ULOG target for ipv6 Jonas Berlin
2005-02-11 22:10     ` netfilter question Pedro Fortuna
2005-02-14 23:25     ` ULOG target for ipv6 Harald Welte
2005-02-15  0:11       ` Jonas Berlin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=420D5CC8.1060600@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
    --cc=pablo@eurodev.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).