From: Brad Fisher <brad@info-link.net>
To: Gregor Maier <gregor@net.in.tum.de>
Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist <netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: libnetfilter_queue man page
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 12:10:00 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43FB5778.2050301@info-link.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43FB47CE.8030003@net.in.tum.de>
Gregor Maier wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
>> -----------------
>> nfq_set_verdict()
>> -----------------
>>
>> Prototype:
>> int nfq_set_verdict(struct nfq_q_handle *qh, u_int32_t id, u_int32_t verdict, u_int32_t data_len, unsigned char *buf)
>>
>> Parameters:
>> qh Netfilter queue handle obtained by call to nfq_create_queue().
>> id ID assigned to packet by netfilter. Can be obtained by:
>> int id;
>> struct nfqnl_msg_packet_hdr *ph = nfq_get_msg_packet_hdr(tb);
>> if (ph) id = ntohl(ph->packet_id);
>> verdict Verdict to return to netfilter
>> NF_ACCEPT - Accept the packet
>> NF_DROP - Drop the packet
>> ??? - anything else possible? (ie. continue?,
>> jump? goto? log?)
>>
> After digging through kernel source I'm pretty sure, that the only
> possible verdicts are
> NF_DROP, NF_ACCEPT
> NF_REPEAT (queue the packet to userspace again) --> may lead to loops
> NF_QUEUE same as NF_REPEAT. There's a differnce between the handling
> of NF_QUEUE and NF_REPEAT, but I don't know what this difference leads to.
>
> Why? When a packet is queued to userspace it "leaves" the current hook
> (e.g. the filter table) for good therefore it's not possible to continue
> with the next rule in the current chain or to jump to another chain.
>
> Maybe you also want to take a look at the Netfilter Hacking Howto, esp.
> section 3 (netfilter architecture)
>
> btw: thank's for the manpage
>
>
Glad to hear someone has found it useful :)
You are correct, I also came to the conclusion that those are the only
verdicts available. The NF_REPEAT verdict seems to send the packet back
through the entire chain/hook. It doesn't start it at the next rule
following the queue rule (which I'd like to have, but perhaps it's not
possible).
BTW: I have had a chance to actually work with the library a bit, so I
have updated my notes since I sent the previous message. I didn't add
much, just updated some of the questionable info. If anyone is
interested, I'll be glad to send them a copy. So far the biggest issues
I've run into are that marking doesn't work in 2.6.15 (I think it should
in 2.6.16), and I can't seem to ever read the timestamp for a packet, no
matter what hook it comes in on. I've just been using gettimeofday for
that for now.
-Brad
> cu
> gregor
> - --
> Gregor Maier Lehrstuhl Informatik 8
> gregor@net.in.tum.de Tel: +49 89 289-18010
> http://www.net.in.tum.de TU Muenchen
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFD+0fOdGiwgbikMYMRAqCxAJ4vBk3pXKiIe5p564wYkHgXtXU7yACdHTSt
> 1rg3M/wEsrggvlMrOC+KMTI=
> =GYqs
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> !DSPAM:3824,43fb47d3148949031012739!
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-21 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1139235549.30902.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>
2006-02-08 14:19 ` libnetfilter_queue man page Harald Welte
2006-02-08 17:12 ` Brad Fisher
2006-02-08 18:18 ` Brad Fisher
2006-02-21 17:03 ` Gregor Maier
2006-02-21 18:10 ` Brad Fisher [this message]
2007-02-27 8:05 Julien DHERSIN
2007-02-28 12:43 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2007-03-02 13:15 ` Julien DHERSIN
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-01 21:00 Jay Manni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43FB5778.2050301@info-link.net \
--to=brad@info-link.net \
--cc=gregor@net.in.tum.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).