From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: David Madore <david.madore@ens.fr>,
netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] netfilter: implement TCPMSS target for IPv6
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:18:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45AB54E5.6060103@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0701151109540.32479@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Jan 15 2007 09:39, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>>I'm not sure how well that will work (the IPv4/IPv6-specific stuff
>>is spread over the entire target function), but its worth a try.
>
>
> "Nothing is impossible." Since you happened to take that one for
> yourself... well here's a q: would a patch be accepted that changes
> all ipt and ip6t modules to the new xt? Even if a module is only for
> ipv4 or ipv6, I think it makes sense to reduce the number of
> different *t structures floating around.
If you're talking about using the xt-structures in net/ipv[46]/netfilter
and removing the ipt/ip6t-wrappers, that would make sense IMO.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-15 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-14 19:20 [patch] netfilter: implement TCPMSS target for IPv6 David Madore
2007-01-14 20:10 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-01-15 0:35 ` David Madore
2007-01-15 8:40 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-01-15 8:39 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-01-15 10:12 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-01-15 10:18 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2007-01-15 13:01 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-01-15 14:38 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-01-15 14:40 ` [PATCH] Re: ipt->xt (was: implement TCPMSS target for IPv6) Jan Engelhardt
2007-01-15 14:51 ` [PATCH] Re: ipt->xt Patrick McHardy
2007-01-15 16:34 ` ipt->xt Jan Engelhardt
2007-01-15 16:36 ` ipt->xt Patrick McHardy
2007-01-15 16:39 ` ipt->xt [p2] Jan Engelhardt
2007-01-17 11:31 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-01-17 12:38 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-01-17 12:40 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-01-17 13:13 ` ipt->xt [p3] Jan Engelhardt
2007-01-17 13:17 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-01-17 14:14 ` [PATCH 1/3] Fix return values for LOG and ULOG Jan Engelhardt
2007-01-17 14:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] XT: xt_match and xt_target Jan Engelhardt
2007-01-17 14:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] XT: xt_table Jan Engelhardt
2007-01-15 18:42 ` [patch] netfilter: implement TCPMSS target for IPv6 Patrick McHardy
2007-01-15 20:02 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-01-16 12:20 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-01-16 10:21 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2007-01-16 13:34 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-01-16 14:22 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2007-01-19 4:27 ` Yasuyuki KOZAKAI
[not found] ` <200701190427.l0J4RO51024049@toshiba.co.jp>
2007-01-19 12:16 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-02-12 16:08 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2007-02-12 16:33 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45AB54E5.6060103@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=david.madore@ens.fr \
--cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).