From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [patch] netfilter: implement TCPMSS target for IPv6 Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 15:38:48 +0100 Message-ID: <45AB91F8.1050802@trash.net> References: <20070114192011.GA6270@clipper.ens.fr> <45AB3DCA.9020204@trash.net> <45AB54E5.6060103@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: Jan Engelhardt In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org [CC-list trimmed] Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Jan 15 2007 11:18, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >>If you're talking about using the xt-structures in net/ipv[46]/netfilter >>and removing the ipt/ip6t-wrappers, that would make sense IMO. > > > Yup. Should the files then be renamed/moved to net/netfilter/xt_[foobaz].c > in a second step? No, the address family dependant stuff should stay where it is. > Should I leave ipt_TCPMSS/ip6t_TCPMSS untouched while you are working on > that one? Yes, I'm done porting it to x_tables, but it still needs testing.