From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: Problems with autotools Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:49:45 +0100 Message-ID: <45B60469.2020305@netfilter.org> References: <200701231224.43655.victor.stinner@inl.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: Victor Stinner In-Reply-To: <200701231224.43655.victor.stinner@inl.fr> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Hi Victor, Victor Stinner wrote: > I noticed minor problems with autotools: > > - conntrack: autoheader 2.60 fails because location of config.h is missing > ~~> add « AM_CONFIG_HEADER(config.h) » in configure.in Actually, the conntrack tool does not require any config.h in order to compile so the autoheader thing is not required AFAIK. Just committed a patch to remove the invocation of autoheader. > - libnfnetlink, libnetfilter_conntrack, libnetfilter_queue autogen.sh use "==" > to compare string whereas sh only accepts "=" > ~~> use « [ "x$1" = "xdistrib" ] && include » Fixed in SVN > - libtoolize may use option --force and --automake Just read the docs but unsure about when to use one or another. -- The dawn of the fourth age of Linux firewalling is coming; a time of great struggle and heroic deeds -- J.Kadlecsik got inspired by J.Morris