From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Robbie Dinn <robbie@microbus.com>
Cc: Netfilter Core Team <coreteam@netfilter.org>,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Netfilter List cross-subscription [Re: Test]
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:08:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46EE8A75.4030609@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46EE840D.20209@microbus.com>
Robbie Dinn wrote:
> /Lurk mode off/
> Replying off list because this might be stupid/irrelevant/off topic.
It was on-list but I prefer to keep the discussion open anyways :)
> Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>>The cross-subscription appears to work, unfortunately (due to the
>>subscriber-only posting settings of the old list) senders to the
>>new lists that are not subscribed to the old one will receive a
>>"held for moderator approval" mail for each post. Since this is
>>probably quite annoying for everyone, I'm not sure whether we
>>should really do the cross-subscription thing.
>>
>>Any better ideas or suggestions?
>
>
> You could bounce messages sent to netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
> If the bounce message contained a
> "mailing list has moved to netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org" message,
> then assuming that people bother to read their bounces or don't routinely
> discard them, then they would eventually get to send the message to the
> right list.
>
> Postfix has a relocated table for these "user has moved to new_location"
> messages. But you are using exim. I am not familiar with exim but perhaps
> it has something similar?
I don't know, but something like that should work. I think its not
too much asked of people to resubscribe, so my suggestion is to
simply disable the netfilter.org lists, generate a bounce message
and have people resubscribe. The amount of dead subscriptions seems
to be very high anyways, after only 10 hours of forwarding bounce
messages to my address I got around 6000 emails.
If there are no (reasonable) objections I'll try to reconfigure
mailman to do this tonight.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-17 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-17 11:35 Test Patrick McHardy
2007-09-17 11:47 ` Netfilter List cross-subscription [Re: Test] Patrick McHardy
2007-09-17 13:41 ` Robbie Dinn
2007-09-17 14:08 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2007-09-17 15:23 ` Netfilter List cross-subscription Pascal Hambourg
2007-09-18 11:25 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-09-17 15:30 ` Netfilter List cross-subscription [Re: Test] Thomas Graf
2007-09-18 11:21 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-09-17 17:06 ` Maximilian Wilhelm
2007-09-17 17:10 ` Netfilter List cross-subscription David Miller
2007-09-17 17:13 ` David Miller
2007-09-18 11:23 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46EE8A75.4030609@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robbie@microbus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).