netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de>
Cc: Netfilter Developer Mailing List <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: xt_time 2007-09-22
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 17:39:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46F53749.5070303@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709221734080.15712@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Sep 22 2007 17:19, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>   
>> A thought just occured to me (a bit late, but better than never :) ..
>>
>> Can't we just convert the user-specified times/dates to unix time
>> and match on that without all these expensive calculations? At least
>> for pure time matching without days this should work fine ..
>>     
>
> Pure time matching (--datestart, --datestop) already use unix timing.
>   
Right, I missed that.

> Daytime (--timestart) ... I wonder how you'd model
> "from 12:00 to 13:00, each day" other than it is done now.
> Same for weekday.
>   

You're right again, that doesn't seem to be possible.

> Leaves monthday matching, which could probably be done with some more
> static tables, but I'd have to dig up some old encyclopedia from 1972
> and see how they did it.
>   

I guess that will be a very rarely used feature anyway, don't
bother.

>   
>>> +	localtime_3(&current_time, stamp);
>>> +
>>> +	if (!(info->monthdays_match & (1 << current_time.monthday)))
>>> +		return false;
>>>   
>>>       
>> I'd add a flag or check whether weekdays_match/monthdays_match
>> equals ~0 before doing the localtime calculations.
>>     
>
> Certainly.
>
>   

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-22 15:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-22 11:26 xt_time 2007-09-22 Jan Engelhardt
2007-09-22 11:28 ` xt_time 2007-09-22 (iptables) Jan Engelhardt
2007-09-23 15:08   ` Patrick McHardy
2007-09-22 15:19 ` xt_time 2007-09-22 Patrick McHardy
2007-09-22 15:38   ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-09-22 15:39     ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2007-09-22 15:47       ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-09-22 15:58     ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-09-23 15:05       ` Patrick McHardy
2007-09-23 15:32         ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-09-23 16:20           ` Patrick McHardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46F53749.5070303@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=jengelh@computergmbh.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).