From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: iptables -> can't initialize iptables table `filter': Bad file descriptor Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:22:46 +0100 Message-ID: <47624B66.5060205@trash.net> References: <47565BB3.9030500@trash.net> <4757C632.60503@trash.net> <475E6696.50805@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Laurence J. Lane" , Netfilter Development Mailinglist To: Salatiel Filho Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:35440 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751672AbXLNJWv (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2007 04:22:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Salatiel Filho wrote: > On 12/13/07, Laurence J. Lane wrote: >> On Dec 11, 2007 5:29 AM, Patrick McHardy wrote: >> >>> It shouldn't, but I haven't seen any other complaints about this >>> yet, so please try to either compile the kernel natively or also >>> cross-compile iptables. >> [ I'm jumping in on the end of the thread with comments not directed >> at anyone specific.] >> >> I just saw an additional comment to #446685. A search for "EABI iptables" >> shows a known arm iptables' problem and at least one workaround is the chroot >> method mentioned in the report. >> >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=446685 The bad fd bug visible in the strace attached to that report is the one I fixed in SVN. > I have not test the solution cause i have to download 116MB to chroot :) > But i`m curious , if i compile both source kernel and source iptables > , should`t they be compatible ? They should, unless something is causing different structure layout.