From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: Quota on SMP AGAIN Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:13:55 +0100 Message-ID: <477520C3.8040501@trash.net> References: <4773C13D.1040106@simm.ru> <477515BB.1060303@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gpf , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:33645 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752790AbXL1QOJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Dec 2007 11:14:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Dec 28 2007 16:26, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >> gpf wrote: >> >>> hi >>> >>> iptables, iptables-save not working properly >>> >>> [root@ns bind] iptables -L quot |grep devel >>> RETURN 0 -- anywhere developer.simm.ru quota: >>> 226620450 bytes >>> [root@ns bind] dpkg -l |grep iptables >>> ii iptables 1.3.6.0debian1-5 >>> >>> >> The quota extension in old iptables releases is incompatible with the >> version merged upstream. >> > > I am seeing this too on 2.6.23.10 with iptables-1.4.0svn7097. > No incompatibilities obvious to me, both kernel and iptables use > the same xt_quota.h. Gpf's report didn't include an actual description of the problem, so I can only assume its an incorrect value of the quota. What exactly are the effects you're seeing?