From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/27] Extend nf_inet_addr with in{,6}_addr Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:49:29 +0100 Message-ID: <477E4779.8080806@trash.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Netfilter Developer Mailing List To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:48587 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752208AbYADOwb (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jan 2008 09:52:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jan Engelhardt wrote: > commit 827c835ce662ee0e060b936ac4cb35a6b2e5c10a > Author: Jan Engelhardt > Date: Wed Jan 2 17:54:52 2008 +0100 > > [NETFILTER]: Extend nf_inet_addr with in{,6}_addr > > Extend union nf_inet_addr with struct in_addr and in6_addr. Useful > because a lot of in-kernel IPv4 and IPv6 functions use > in_addr/in6_addr. Also applied, thanks. Perhaps a better way would be to consistently only use one of both types (be32 or in_addr), but for now this seems fine.