From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Inline functions iptcc_is_builtin() and set_changed(). Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:01:54 +0100 Message-ID: <478CE702.3060306@trash.net> References: <1198244659.23885.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1198244774.23885.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Netfilter Developers , Harald Welte , Martin Josefsson To: jdb@comx.dk Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:44765 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751097AbYAORCG (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:02:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1198244774.23885.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > The two functions are obvious candidates for inlining. > Using gprof(1) shows that they actually affects performance. > > Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Applied, thanks.