From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] [NETFILTER]: xt_recent: IPv6 support
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 14:48:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47FCBB15.90003@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e6fb8173fde4f1ea0cee785b763a2b2b37a89ebb.1207668694.git.jengelh@computergmbh.de>
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> This updates xt_recent to support the IPv6 address family.
> The new /proc/net/xt_recent directory must be used for this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de>
> ---
> Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 3 +
> net/netfilter/xt_recent.c | 271 ++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 221 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> index 0209a5a..9b54720 100644
> --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> @@ -249,6 +249,9 @@ What (Why):
> - xt_mark match revision 0
> (superseded by xt_mark match revision 1)
>
> + - xt_recent: the old ipt_recent proc dir
> + (superseded by /proc/net/xt_recent)
> +
Could you introduce a new option for this please? Something
like CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_PROC_COMPAT.
Another thing is .. while I'm very much in favour of removing
old crap, I don't think feature-removal-schedule helps much
for informing users since basically nobody reads it (I know
I don't). So perhaps we should add a WARN_ON_ONCE or something
to interfaces scheduled for removal. Just meant for discussion,
not to be done in this patch yet.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-09 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-08 15:31 [PATCH 1/8] [NETFILTER]: Rename ipt_recent to xt_recent Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-08 15:31 ` [PATCH 2/8] [NETFILTER]: xt_recent: IPv6 support Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-09 12:48 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2008-04-09 13:30 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-09 13:44 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-09 13:48 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-08 15:31 ` [PATCH 3/8] [NETFILTER]: rename NF_ARP to NFPROTO_ARP and assign a non-clashing value Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-09 12:52 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-09 13:09 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-09 13:12 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-09 13:17 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-09 13:21 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-09 13:34 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-09 13:42 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-09 13:48 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-09 13:51 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-09 13:59 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-09 14:30 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-09 14:39 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-09 14:57 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-09 15:12 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-09 15:15 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-09 16:31 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-09 16:35 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-09 16:46 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-09 16:50 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-09 16:59 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-09 17:05 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-09 17:38 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-10 1:10 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-08 15:31 ` [PATCH 4/8] [NETFILTER]: Implement AF_UNSPEC as a wildcard for extensions Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-08 15:31 ` [PATCH 5/8] [NETFILTER]: Give AF-independent extensions an arpt_ alias Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-08 15:31 ` [PATCH 6/8] [NETFILTER]: Make Ebtables use Xtables infrastructure Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-09 13:08 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-09 13:12 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-09 16:52 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-10 20:11 ` Bart De Schuymer
2008-04-10 20:52 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-13 5:24 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-08 15:31 ` [PATCH 7/8] [NETFILTER]: Collapse tcpmss_reverse_mtu{4,6} into one function Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-15 12:51 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-15 13:57 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-15 13:59 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-08 15:31 ` [PATCH 8/8] [NETFILTER]: Deploy a prefix_length-to-network mask mapping table Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-09 12:45 ` [PATCH 1/8] [NETFILTER]: Rename ipt_recent to xt_recent Patrick McHardy
2008-04-09 12:50 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-09 12:53 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47FCBB15.90003@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=jengelh@computergmbh.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox