Linux Netfilter development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Mader <thezema@gmail.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de>
Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist
	<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: Re: Throughput test for kernelspace module vs. userspace daemon with strange results
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:01:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47FF7D2D.20804@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0804111509140.21182@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> You are using a raw socket in userspace, which effectively
> bypasses Netfilter.
> To make a meaningful test of it, the PF_RAW code would need
> an NF_HOOK into iptables to make a more accurate comparison I think.

I don't understand what you mean since I also have a raw socket in 
kernelspace. Is it because I use kernel_sendmsg to send the icmp packet 
in kernelspace? I cannot believe that I get a ~5mbit/s decrease in 
throughput only because the sent icmp packets go through my module in 
kernelspace but not in userspace.

Nevertheless I removed the icmp send stuff from both and tested again. 
Now I get 95.60mbit/s for kernelspace and 95.69mbit/s for userspace. I 
think I can conclude that there is no drawback in throughput performance 
by using the userspace daemon, though the reason for it is still unknown.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2008-04-11 15:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-11 13:01 Throughput test for kernelspace module vs. userspace daemon with strange results Thomas Mader
2008-04-11 13:10 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-11 13:16   ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-11 15:01   ` Thomas Mader [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47FF7D2D.20804@gmail.com \
    --to=thezema@gmail.com \
    --cc=jengelh@computergmbh.de \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox