From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Fabian Hugelshofer <hugelshofer2006@gmx.ch>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] libnfnetlink byte alignment
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 23:42:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48470C52.1080306@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48465802.2010005@gmx.ch>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1424 bytes --]
Fabian Hugelshofer wrote:
> Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> Fabian Hugelshofer wrote:
>>> Aligns buffers to maximum alignment of architecture to make the cast of
>>> char pointers to struct pointers more portable.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Fabian Hugelshofer <hugelshofer2006@gmx.ch>
>>
>> They all seem fine to me, but a union might make it look
>> a bit nicer :)
>
> In libnfnetlink the union does not make sense, because multiple casts
> are done from the same buffer at different locations.
>
> For libnetfilter-(conntrack|log) the union would be possible:
>
> Original (aligned):
> << code begin >>
> char buf[...] __attribute__ ((aligned));
> struct nlmsghdr *nmh = (struct nlmsghdr *) buf;
>
> nfnl_fill_hdr(h->nfnlssh, nmh, 0, pf, queuenum, ...);
> << code end >>
>
> Union style:
> << code begin >>
> union {
> char buf[...];
> struct nlmsghdr nmh;
> } u;
>
> nfnl_fill_hdr(h->nfnlssh, &u.nmh, 0, pf, queuenum, ...);
> << code end >>
>
> I can rewrite it like this, if desired...
Please, use union wherever it is possible. BTW, it seems to me that the
conntrack-tools may suffer from the same portability problem. The
(supposed) fix, which is attached, is ugly but union does not help since
the size of struct nf_conntrack is not known. I do not find a way to do
this cleanly without removing the use of the stack for temporary object
allocation.
--
"Los honestos son inadaptados sociales" -- Les Luthiers
[-- Attachment #2: y --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2345 bytes --]
diff --git a/src/cache_wt.c b/src/cache_wt.c
index 65a1fc4..9c1b69c 100644
--- a/src/cache_wt.c
+++ b/src/cache_wt.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
static void add_wt(struct us_conntrack *u)
{
int ret;
- char __ct[nfct_maxsize()];
+ char __ct[nfct_maxsize()] __attribute__((aligned));
struct nf_conntrack *ct = (struct nf_conntrack *)(void*) __ct;
ret = nl_exist_conntrack(u->ct);
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static void add_wt(struct us_conntrack *u)
static void upd_wt(struct us_conntrack *u)
{
- char __ct[nfct_maxsize()];
+ char __ct[nfct_maxsize()] __attribute__((aligned));
struct nf_conntrack *ct = (struct nf_conntrack *)(void*) __ct;
memcpy(ct, u->ct, nfct_maxsize());
diff --git a/src/conntrack.c b/src/conntrack.c
index 25a3a57..d2e1b47 100644
--- a/src/conntrack.c
+++ b/src/conntrack.c
@@ -747,7 +747,7 @@ static int update_cb(enum nf_conntrack_msg_type type,
{
int res;
struct nf_conntrack *obj = data;
- char __tmp[nfct_maxsize()];
+ char __tmp[nfct_maxsize()] __attribute__((aligned));
struct nf_conntrack *tmp = (struct nf_conntrack *) (void *)__tmp;
memcpy(tmp, obj, sizeof(__tmp));
@@ -873,14 +873,14 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
unsigned int type = 0, event_mask = 0, l4flags = 0, status = 0;
int res = 0;
int family = AF_UNSPEC;
- char __obj[nfct_maxsize()];
- char __exptuple[nfct_maxsize()];
- char __mask[nfct_maxsize()];
+ char __obj[nfct_maxsize()] __attribute__((aligned));
+ char __exptuple[nfct_maxsize()] __attribute__((aligned));
+ char __mask[nfct_maxsize()] __attribute__((aligned));
struct nf_conntrack *obj = (struct nf_conntrack *)(void*) __obj;
struct nf_conntrack *exptuple =
(struct nf_conntrack *)(void*) __exptuple;
struct nf_conntrack *mask = (struct nf_conntrack *)(void*) __mask;
- char __exp[nfexp_maxsize()];
+ char __exp[nfexp_maxsize()] __attribute__((aligned));
struct nf_expect *exp = (struct nf_expect *)(void*) __exp;
int l3protonum;
union ct_address ad;
diff --git a/src/sync-mode.c b/src/sync-mode.c
index 4b36935..1b6ec48 100644
--- a/src/sync-mode.c
+++ b/src/sync-mode.c
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
static void do_mcast_handler_step(struct nethdr *net, size_t remain)
{
int query;
- char __ct[nfct_maxsize()];
+ char __ct[nfct_maxsize()] __attribute__((aligned));
struct nf_conntrack *ct = (struct nf_conntrack *)(void*) __ct;
struct us_conntrack *u;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-04 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-03 10:20 [PATCH 1/3] libnfnetlink byte alignment Fabian Hugelshofer
2008-06-03 13:06 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-06-04 8:53 ` Fabian Hugelshofer
2008-06-04 14:35 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-06-04 21:42 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2008-06-05 12:55 ` Fabian Hugelshofer
2008-06-05 13:31 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-06-18 12:39 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48470C52.1080306@netfilter.org \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=hugelshofer2006@gmx.ch \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox