From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Eric Leblond <eric@inl.fr>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ULOGD PATCH] rework, fill MAC address in ULOG for ethernet.
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:26:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <487CA584.3030200@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080715124924.GA7175@khasse.inl.fr>
Eric Leblond wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Friday, 2008 July 11 at 16:08:50 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>>> This comment made me believe that it would break header
>>>> printing for non-ethernet packets. If that is not true,
>>>> I have no objections.
>>> Hmm, you're right but user using non-ethernet packets can upgrade to
>>> NFLOG ;)
>> I assume thats not meant seriously :) But we should integrate
>> new features into the new things, not break old things and
>> expect users to upgrade :)
>
> Well, we still have a problem here:
> * ULOG logs raw hardware header
> * NFLOG logs source hardware address only
> * SQL output module only support real MAC address (at least for PGSQL which
> has a dedicated type)
>
> I'm not able to find a clean and easy way to fix this.
>
> Here's some possible solutions:
> * Modify mac type in database to support everything:
> * Performance impact
> * Different datatypes in same field :(
It seems we already have a problem here since we can't put
other link layer headers in the database.
> * NFLOG modification to log full hardware header:
> * Will revert to a non parsable field :(
How about extending nfnetlink_log to include the full MAC header
and link layer type? That will make it a superset of ULOG.
> * ULOG header parsing:
> * Incomplete and untrustable by design
> * May be able to retrieve source HW address info in most cases
> * ULOG could output fields raw.mac and raw.mac.saddr to ensure
> compatibility with older applications
Why don't you do something similar to your previous patch,
but instead of refusing unknown header lengths, treat
them as before?
> IMHO last solution is the less worst one. If it seems ok for you, I will
> provide a patchset implementing this solution.
I don't think I understand the problem well enough yet
to make that decision. Generally, I'm fine with anything
that doesn't break existing features and doesn't stand
in the way of correctly handling non-ethernet headers.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-15 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-19 12:23 [ULOGD PATCH 0/6] Fix difference between ULOG and NFLOG Eric Leblond
2008-06-19 12:23 ` [ULOGD PATCH 1/6] Suppress spaces at end of line Eric Leblond
2008-06-23 14:23 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-06-19 12:23 ` [ULOGD PATCH 2/6] Convert struct to [KEY] = {} format Eric Leblond
2008-06-23 14:23 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-06-19 12:23 ` [ULOGD PATCH 3/6] Fix warning about unused variable if NFLOG_GID is not available Eric Leblond
2008-06-23 14:25 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-06-27 19:41 ` Eric Leblond
2008-06-27 20:29 ` Eric Leblond
2008-06-28 9:54 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-06-28 10:25 ` Eric Leblond
2008-06-28 10:45 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-06-28 10:45 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-06-19 12:23 ` [ULOGD PATCH 4/6] Introduce datatype and hwaddrlen param to MAC2STR plugin Eric Leblond
2008-06-23 14:42 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-06-27 23:02 ` [ULOGD PATCH 0/6] rework mac address related issues Eric Leblond
2008-06-27 23:02 ` [ULOGD PATCH 1/6] Specify that NFLOG only return mac saddr Eric Leblond
2008-06-27 23:02 ` [ULOGD PATCH 2/6] Adapt MAC2STR to NFLOG and ULOG input key change Eric Leblond
2008-06-27 23:02 ` [ULOGD PATCH 3/6] Output mac.saddr and mac.daddr in ULOG plugin Eric Leblond
2008-07-02 13:52 ` [ULOGD PATCH] Output mac.saddr, mac.daddr and oob.protocol " Eric Leblond
2008-07-02 13:56 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-07-08 21:56 ` [ULOGD PATCH] rework, fill MAC address in ULOG for ethernet Eric Leblond
2008-07-09 10:50 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-07-09 10:53 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-07-09 11:03 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-07-09 11:10 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-07-09 21:04 ` Eric Leblond
2008-07-09 21:18 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-07-10 20:39 ` Eric Leblond
2008-07-11 14:08 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-07-15 12:49 ` Eric Leblond
2008-07-15 13:26 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2008-07-16 22:24 ` netfilter: Send complete hardware header in NFLOG Eric Leblond
2008-07-17 9:01 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-07-17 9:12 ` Eric Leblond
2008-07-17 9:14 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-07-16 22:29 ` [libnetfilter_log PATCH] Add parsing function for raw hardware header Eric Leblond
2008-07-17 9:13 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-07-16 22:31 ` [ULOGD2 PATCH] Sync NFLOG input plugin with NFLOG modification related to " Eric Leblond
2008-07-20 23:51 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-06-27 23:02 ` [ULOGD PATCH 4/6] Parse oob protocol in ULOG when possible Eric Leblond
2008-06-27 23:02 ` [ULOGD PATCH 5/6] Add destination mac_addr to database Eric Leblond
2008-06-27 23:03 ` [ULOGD PATCH 6/6] Sync PRINTPKT with mac modification Eric Leblond
2008-06-19 12:23 ` [ULOGD PATCH 5/6] Add destination mac_addr to database Eric Leblond
2008-06-23 14:44 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-06-19 12:23 ` [ULOGD PATCH 6/6] Suppress verbose debug message in ULOG Eric Leblond
2008-06-23 14:46 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2008-06-19 12:25 ` netfilter: Make NFLOG dump all hardware header Eric Leblond
2008-06-19 12:30 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-06-19 12:55 ` [PATCH] Change packet hw header struct accordingly to NFLOG update Eric Leblond
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=487CA584.3030200@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=eric@inl.fr \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox