From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
Fabian Hugelshofer <hugelshofer2006@gmx.ch>
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] get rid of module refcounting in ctnetlink
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:03:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48904A6D.3010404@netfilter.org> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 382 bytes --]
[PATCH] get rid of module refcounting in ctnetlink
This patch replaces the unnecessary module refcounting with
the read-side locks. With this patch, all the dump and fill_info
function are called under the RCU read lock.
Based on a patch from Fabian Hugelshofer.
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
--
"Los honestos son inadaptados sociales" -- Les Luthiers
[-- Attachment #2: 00.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 4652 bytes --]
[PATCH] get rid of module refcounting in ctnetlink
This patch replaces the unnecessary module refcounting with
the read-side locks. With this patch, all the dump and fill_info
function are called under the RCU read lock.
Based on a patch from Fabian Hugelshofer.
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Index: net-next-2.6.git/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
===================================================================
--- net-next-2.6.git.orig/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c 2008-07-29 14:24:39.000000000 +0200
+++ net-next-2.6.git/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c 2008-07-29 14:24:41.000000000 +0200
@@ -103,16 +103,14 @@ ctnetlink_dump_tuples(struct sk_buff *sk
struct nf_conntrack_l3proto *l3proto;
struct nf_conntrack_l4proto *l4proto;
- l3proto = nf_ct_l3proto_find_get(tuple->src.l3num);
+ l3proto = __nf_ct_l3proto_find(tuple->src.l3num);
ret = ctnetlink_dump_tuples_ip(skb, tuple, l3proto);
- nf_ct_l3proto_put(l3proto);
if (unlikely(ret < 0))
return ret;
- l4proto = nf_ct_l4proto_find_get(tuple->src.l3num, tuple->dst.protonum);
+ l4proto = __nf_ct_l4proto_find(tuple->src.l3num, tuple->dst.protonum);
ret = ctnetlink_dump_tuples_proto(skb, tuple, l4proto);
- nf_ct_l4proto_put(l4proto);
return ret;
}
@@ -149,11 +147,9 @@ ctnetlink_dump_protoinfo(struct sk_buff
struct nlattr *nest_proto;
int ret;
- l4proto = nf_ct_l4proto_find_get(nf_ct_l3num(ct), nf_ct_protonum(ct));
- if (!l4proto->to_nlattr) {
- nf_ct_l4proto_put(l4proto);
+ l4proto = __nf_ct_l4proto_find(nf_ct_l3num(ct), nf_ct_protonum(ct));
+ if (!l4proto->to_nlattr)
return 0;
- }
nest_proto = nla_nest_start(skb, CTA_PROTOINFO | NLA_F_NESTED);
if (!nest_proto)
@@ -161,14 +157,11 @@ ctnetlink_dump_protoinfo(struct sk_buff
ret = l4proto->to_nlattr(skb, nest_proto, ct);
- nf_ct_l4proto_put(l4proto);
-
nla_nest_end(skb, nest_proto);
return ret;
nla_put_failure:
- nf_ct_l4proto_put(l4proto);
return -1;
}
@@ -182,7 +175,6 @@ ctnetlink_dump_helpinfo(struct sk_buff *
if (!help)
return 0;
- rcu_read_lock();
helper = rcu_dereference(help->helper);
if (!helper)
goto out;
@@ -197,11 +189,9 @@ ctnetlink_dump_helpinfo(struct sk_buff *
nla_nest_end(skb, nest_helper);
out:
- rcu_read_unlock();
return 0;
nla_put_failure:
- rcu_read_unlock();
return -1;
}
@@ -458,6 +448,7 @@ static int ctnetlink_conntrack_event(str
nfmsg->version = NFNETLINK_V0;
nfmsg->res_id = 0;
+ rcu_read_lock();
nest_parms = nla_nest_start(skb, CTA_TUPLE_ORIG | NLA_F_NESTED);
if (!nest_parms)
goto nla_put_failure;
@@ -519,13 +510,15 @@ static int ctnetlink_conntrack_event(str
&& ctnetlink_dump_mark(skb, ct) < 0)
goto nla_put_failure;
#endif
+ rcu_read_unlock();
nlh->nlmsg_len = skb->tail - b;
nfnetlink_send(skb, 0, group, 0);
return NOTIFY_DONE;
-nlmsg_failure:
nla_put_failure:
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+nlmsg_failure:
kfree_skb(skb);
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
@@ -863,8 +856,10 @@ ctnetlink_get_conntrack(struct sock *ctn
return -ENOMEM;
}
+ rcu_read_lock();
err = ctnetlink_fill_info(skb2, NETLINK_CB(skb).pid, nlh->nlmsg_seq,
IPCTNL_MSG_CT_NEW, 1, ct);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
nf_ct_put(ct);
if (err <= 0)
goto free;
@@ -1316,16 +1311,14 @@ ctnetlink_exp_dump_mask(struct sk_buff *
if (!nest_parms)
goto nla_put_failure;
- l3proto = nf_ct_l3proto_find_get(tuple->src.l3num);
+ l3proto = __nf_ct_l3proto_find(tuple->src.l3num);
ret = ctnetlink_dump_tuples_ip(skb, &m, l3proto);
- nf_ct_l3proto_put(l3proto);
if (unlikely(ret < 0))
goto nla_put_failure;
- l4proto = nf_ct_l4proto_find_get(tuple->src.l3num, tuple->dst.protonum);
+ l4proto = __nf_ct_l4proto_find(tuple->src.l3num, tuple->dst.protonum);
ret = ctnetlink_dump_tuples_proto(skb, &m, l4proto);
- nf_ct_l4proto_put(l4proto);
if (unlikely(ret < 0))
goto nla_put_failure;
@@ -1432,15 +1425,18 @@ static int ctnetlink_expect_event(struct
nfmsg->version = NFNETLINK_V0;
nfmsg->res_id = 0;
+ rcu_read_lock();
if (ctnetlink_exp_dump_expect(skb, exp) < 0)
goto nla_put_failure;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
nlh->nlmsg_len = skb->tail - b;
nfnetlink_send(skb, 0, NFNLGRP_CONNTRACK_EXP_NEW, 0);
return NOTIFY_DONE;
-nlmsg_failure:
nla_put_failure:
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+nlmsg_failure:
kfree_skb(skb);
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
@@ -1543,9 +1539,11 @@ ctnetlink_get_expect(struct sock *ctnl,
if (!skb2)
goto out;
+ rcu_read_lock();
err = ctnetlink_exp_fill_info(skb2, NETLINK_CB(skb).pid,
nlh->nlmsg_seq, IPCTNL_MSG_EXP_NEW,
1, exp);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
if (err <= 0)
goto free;
next reply other threads:[~2008-07-30 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-30 11:03 Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2008-07-30 13:24 ` [PATCH 1/7] get rid of module refcounting in ctnetlink Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48904A6D.3010404@netfilter.org \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=hugelshofer2006@gmx.ch \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox