From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: iptables not working with monolithic 2.6.26.5 kernel on ARM Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2008 15:21:06 +0200 Message-ID: <48E8BF42.6010906@trash.net> References: <18661.41641.113458.932029@martins.ozlabs.org> <48E6166F.40607@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Martin Schwenke , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:44612 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752015AbYJENVM (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Oct 2008 09:21:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Friday 2008-10-03 08:56, Patrick McHardy wrote: >> If I remember correctly we had a similar reports that were related to ABI >> mismatches. Please verify that both userspace and kernel are using the >> same ABI, in case they are please post your .config. > > Well, the kernel/userspace certainly has support for mixed 64/32 ABI, > so calling for both being the same seems like an unnecessary push. My knowledge of ARM is quite limited, so you're probably right that its not necessary to have all of userspace match the kernel ABI. But I think its necessary for iptables to avoid alignment differences.