From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/16] [NETFILTER]: Re-add missing checkentry calls
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:34:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48E9F7DD.4070302@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0810050948070.21891@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Sunday 2008-10-05 09:32, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>> Hence these patches are generally designed for on-top-please.
>> That makes sense of course, the question was more about whether
>> it would make it easier for people doing bisections if I fold it.
>> It applies cleanly on top of that change directly, so it wouldn't
>> be a real problem.
>>
> Yes please fold if you can. (Given that I already got a "forced update"
> on today's `git fetch`, I think it's ok ;-)
>
Done, thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-06 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-04 19:41 [PATCH 01/16] [NETFILTER]: Re-add missing checkentry calls Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-04 19:41 ` [PATCH 02/16] [NETFILTER]: Remove left-over checks Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-04 19:41 ` [PATCH 03/16] [NETFILTER]: Make BRIDGE_NF_EBTABLES a menuconfig option Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-04 19:41 ` [PATCH 04/16] [NETFILTER]: Fix name of hopbyhop in Netfilter Kconfig Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-04 19:41 ` [PATCH 05/16] [NETFILTER]: Fix Kconfig entry dependency for ip6t_LOG Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-04 19:41 ` [PATCH 06/16] [NETFILTER]: Sort extensions alphabetically in Netfilter Kconfig Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-04 19:41 ` [PATCH 07/16] [NETFILTER]: Use "if" blocks " Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-04 19:41 ` [PATCH 08/16] [NETFILTER]: Move extension arguments into compound structure (1/6) Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-04 19:41 ` [PATCH 09/16] [NETFILTER]: Move extension arguments into compound structure (2/6) Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-04 19:41 ` [PATCH 10/16] [NETFILTER]: Move extension arguments into compound structure (3/6) Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-04 19:41 ` [PATCH 11/16] [NETFILTER]: Move extension arguments into compound structure (4/6) Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-04 19:41 ` [PATCH 12/16] [NETFILTER]: Move extension arguments into compound structure (5/6) Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-04 19:41 ` [PATCH 13/16] [NETFILTER]: Move extension arguments into compound structure (6/6) Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-04 19:41 ` [PATCH 14/16] [NETFILTER]: Provide invoked family value to extensions Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-04 19:41 ` [PATCH 15/16] [NETFILTER]: Cut down on static data for family-independent extensions Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-04 19:41 ` [PATCH 16/16] [NETFILTER]: Use NFPROTO_UNSPEC in more extensions Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-05 12:50 ` [PATCH 01/16] [NETFILTER]: Re-add missing checkentry calls Patrick McHardy
2008-10-05 13:25 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-05 13:32 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-05 13:53 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-06 11:34 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48E9F7DD.4070302@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox