From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Afi Gjermund Subject: Re: nf_conntrack_count versus '/proc/net/nf_conntrack | wc -l' count Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:55:31 -0800 Message-ID: <48ceaa831002180955v4fd87e20o4e116c87f4f4b259@mail.gmail.com> References: <48ceaa831002150927q166b5955gfa0e1e465903d29d@mail.gmail.com> <1266264287.2859.0.camel@edumazet-laptop> <48ceaa831002151308y5bb2606n2058599f3ec4b82@mail.gmail.com> <1266270757.2859.27.camel@edumazet-laptop> <48ceaa831002151400q4178d121h28887cfdf6625499@mail.gmail.com> <1266271377.2859.28.camel@edumazet-laptop> <48ceaa831002151410j1dbdfce3tcbdb5ceaa86b0e2b@mail.gmail.com> <48ceaa831002180940y65af65b4p5d887f2f1a50b4b@mail.gmail.com> <1266515463.2877.10.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Jan Engelhardt , Patrick McHardy , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from mail-px0-f191.google.com ([209.85.216.191]:38650 "EHLO mail-px0-f191.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752287Ab0BRSDu convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:03:50 -0500 Received: by pxi29 with SMTP id 29so3582233pxi.1 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:03:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1266515463.2877.10.camel@edumazet-laptop> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Eric Dumazet = wrote: > Le jeudi 18 f=E9vrier 2010 =E0 09:40 -0800, Afi Gjermund a =E9crit : >> I am still trying to figure out why the nf_conntrack_count differs >> from the table system. I decided I would use the conntrack userspac= e >> tools. >> Both of my NICs are unplugged with no other userspace applications >> running to affect connection tracking counts. >> >> >> root@titan ~# date >> Thu Feb 18 17:35:21 UTC 2010 >> >> root@titan ~# ./conntrack -C conntrack >> 351 >> >> root@titan ~# date >> Thu Feb 18 17:35:24 UTC 2010 >> >> root@titan ~# ./conntrack -F conntrack >> conntrack v0.9.14 (conntrack-tools): connection tracking table has b= een emptied. >> >> root@titan ~# date >> Thu Feb 18 17:35:31 UTC 2010 >> >> root@titan ~# ./conntrack -C conntrack >> 351 >> >> root@titan ~# date >> Thu Feb 18 17:35:36 UTC 2010 >> >> Shouldn't the value after the flush be 0? The traffic that has creat= ed >> this mess is from a REDIRECT rule in the PREROUTING chain of the 'na= t' >> table. > > Could you post a copy of these rules ? > > Thanks > > > iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -s X.X.X.X -d X.X.X.X --sport X --dport X -j REDIRECT --to-port X -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-dev= el" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html