From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: build: resolve autotools suggestions Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:27:44 +0100 Message-ID: <495A05B0.8070700@netfilter.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: kaber@trash.net, Netfilter Developer Mailing List To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:34077 "EHLO us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751464AbYL3MGY (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2008 07:06:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jan Engelhardt wrote: > parent cea9f71f5618250a38acb21c31fbbf93a752f7d4 > commit 6fdeb9468f1bac11698b200530cd454a167e1e39 > Author: Jan Engelhardt > Date: Thu Dec 25 20:21:36 2008 +0100 >=20 > build: resolve autotools suggestions >=20 > libtool2 wants to put files into m4, so let it have it. I don't quite understand this change since I'm not a autotools guru. Bu= t according to the manual, there's a more portable way to do this: "In the future other Autotools will automatically check the contents of AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR, but at the moment it is more portable to add the macro directory to ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS in Makefile.am, which is where the tools currently look. If libtoolize doesn't see AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR, it too will honour the first =91-I=92 argument in ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS when cho= osing a directory to store libtool configuration macros in. It is perfectly sensible to use both AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR and ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS, as long a= s they are kept in synchronisation." I'd appreciate a more detailed clarification on what you want to do. Th= anks. --=20 "Los honestos son inadaptados sociales" -- Les Luthiers -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-dev= el" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html