From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: netfilter: xtables: Combine ipt_TTL and ip6t_HL source Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:08:03 +0100 Message-ID: <4976D7E3.7040603@trash.net> References: <38bcb3ec0901201437t6ba198c8w83ecea8e3e6d4cde@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: James King , Netfilter Developer Mailing List To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:47920 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751730AbZAUIIE (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:08:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Tuesday 2009-01-20 23:37, James King wrote: >>> netfilter: xtables: Combine ipt_TTL and ip6t_HL source >>> >>> Similarly to commit c9fd49680954714473d6cbd2546d6ff120f96840, merge >>> TTL and HL. Since HL does not depend on any IPv6-specific function, >>> no new module dependencies would arise. > >>> + .table = "mangle", >> Can we drop the mangle restriction at the same time? Otherwise, looks >> good to me. > > One thing at a time, I'd say. Agreed. Both look fine, but I'm not taking patches for 2.6.30 yet. Please resubmit once Dave starts accepting patches into net-next.git.