* 2.6.28(.1) and netlink: scheduling while atomic
@ 2009-01-21 9:29 Kövesdi György
2009-01-21 9:54 ` Patrick McHardy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kövesdi György @ 2009-01-21 9:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Netfilter Developer Mailing List
Hi,
The new netlink interface allows to add NAT directly to a conntrack entry.
If it is used when the moudule nf-nat-ipv4 is not loaded in, it results in
crash:
BUG: scheduling while atomic
It is in the kernels 2.6.28 and 2.6.28.1 in the function
ctnetlink_parse_nat_setup(): it calls request_module() which causes the
problem. If the module is already loaded, then there is no problem.
Regards:
K. Gy.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.28(.1) and netlink: scheduling while atomic
2009-01-21 9:29 2.6.28(.1) and netlink: scheduling while atomic Kövesdi György
@ 2009-01-21 9:54 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-01-21 10:25 ` Kövesdi György
2009-01-21 10:59 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2009-01-21 9:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kövesdi György
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Netfilter Developer Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 471 bytes --]
Kövesdi György wrote:
> The new netlink interface allows to add NAT directly to a conntrack entry.
> If it is used when the moudule nf-nat-ipv4 is not loaded in, it results in
> crash:
> BUG: scheduling while atomic
> It is in the kernels 2.6.28 and 2.6.28.1 in the function
> ctnetlink_parse_nat_setup(): it calls request_module() which causes the
> problem. If the module is already loaded, then there is no problem.
Thanks for the report. Does this patch fix it?
[-- Attachment #2: x --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 682 bytes --]
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
index 3dddec6..c32a7e8 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
@@ -831,13 +831,16 @@ ctnetlink_parse_nat_setup(struct nf_conn *ct,
if (!parse_nat_setup) {
#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
rcu_read_unlock();
+ spin_unlock_bh(&nf_conntrack_lock);
nfnl_unlock();
if (request_module("nf-nat-ipv4") < 0) {
nfnl_lock();
+ spin_lock_bh(&nf_conntrack_lock);
rcu_read_lock();
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
nfnl_lock();
+ spin_lock_bh(&nf_conntrack_lock);
rcu_read_lock();
if (nfnetlink_parse_nat_setup_hook)
return -EAGAIN;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.28(.1) and netlink: scheduling while atomic
2009-01-21 9:54 ` Patrick McHardy
@ 2009-01-21 10:25 ` Kövesdi György
2009-01-21 10:59 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kövesdi György @ 2009-01-21 10:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patrick McHardy
Cc: Netfilter Developer Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List
> Thanks for the report. Does this patch fix it?
Thanks, it works!
Regards
K. Gy.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.28(.1) and netlink: scheduling while atomic
2009-01-21 9:54 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-01-21 10:25 ` Kövesdi György
@ 2009-01-21 10:59 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-01-21 11:02 ` Patrick McHardy
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso @ 2009-01-21 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patrick McHardy, Netfilter Development Mailinglist
Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Kövesdi György wrote:
>> The new netlink interface allows to add NAT directly to a conntrack
>> entry.
>> If it is used when the moudule nf-nat-ipv4 is not loaded in, it
>> results in crash:
>> BUG: scheduling while atomic
>> It is in the kernels 2.6.28 and 2.6.28.1 in the function
>> ctnetlink_parse_nat_setup(): it calls request_module() which causes
>> the problem. If the module is already loaded, then there is no problem.
>
> Thanks for the report. Does this patch fix it?
Hm, this was introduced when we fixed the problem with race condition in
the conntrack creation :( It would be worth to pass it to 2.6.29-rc.
--
"Los honestos son inadaptados sociales" -- Les Luthiers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.28(.1) and netlink: scheduling while atomic
2009-01-21 10:59 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
@ 2009-01-21 11:02 ` Patrick McHardy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2009-01-21 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso; +Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist
Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> Thanks for the report. Does this patch fix it?
>
> Hm, this was introduced when we fixed the problem with race condition in
> the conntrack creation :( It would be worth to pass it to 2.6.29-rc.
Of course :) I'll also send it to stable once it hits upstream.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-21 11:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-01-21 9:29 2.6.28(.1) and netlink: scheduling while atomic Kövesdi György
2009-01-21 9:54 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-01-21 10:25 ` Kövesdi György
2009-01-21 10:59 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-01-21 11:02 ` Patrick McHardy
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).