From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: Patch for geoip match agains kernel 2.6.28 Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:51:23 +0100 Message-ID: <4979931B.5060503@netfilter.org> References: <000301c97cd4$4b810f30$e2832d90$%olav@bjerkeset.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: NICOLAS BOULIANE , Svein Olav Bjerkeset , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:45836 "EHLO us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757554AbZAWJvt (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2009 04:51:49 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Friday 2009-01-23 03:22, NICOLAS BOULIANE wrote: >> Thanks for this patch. I'll update my patchlet repository as soon as I get home. >> >> peace, >> acidfu. > > People still use POM patchlets? Gosh... I'm planning to give a spin to POM to keep some (minor number of) patches in it. For example, AFAIK xtables-addons cannot contain patches like ACCOUNT, since they require changes in the main kernel. My opinion on pom-ng and xtables-addons is still the same. I think that they don't have a reason with the current kernel development cycle. And, of course, if Nicolas wants to keep its patchset in pom-ng updated, I would be OK with it. -- "Los honestos son inadaptados sociales" -- Les Luthiers