From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: ct_sync project update Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 02:30:13 +0100 Message-ID: <498E35A5.2070702@netfilter.org> References: <498C6996.5060004@usherbrooke.ca> <20090206172641.GH30540@outback.rfc2324.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:43273 "EHLO us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750936AbZBHBag (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Feb 2009 20:30:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090206172641.GH30540@outback.rfc2324.org> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Maximilian Wilhelm wrote: > Anno domini 2009 David Goulet scripsit: > > Hi! > >> For a University Project, I'm trying to take back the ct_sync >> project and make it work on >= linux kernel 2.6.26. The last patches >> I found are for linux 2.6.10 and much have changed since then. They >> are no longer applicable unless major changes. > > I some time ago[tm] made up patches for 2.6.15/16. > If you *really* want to go for ct_sync, you might want to have a look > at http://files.rfc2324.org/patches/ct_sync/ > >> Is there any other group or "hidden svn" that maintain or contain up >> to date stuff? >> What's your best advice guys for this project? Is it realistic to >> take it back or not? > > Why do you want to? > The user space deamon conntrackd has been developed and evolved as a > successor of ct_sync and can be used with any current kernel > supporting netlink without patching. Indeed: http://conntrack-tools.netfilter.org/ -- "Los honestos son inadaptados sociales" -- Les Luthiers