ct_sync project update

ct_sync project update

[David Goulet]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi people,

For a University Project, I'm trying to take back the ct_sync
project and make it work on >= linux kernel 2.6.26. The last patches
I found are for linux 2.6.10 and much have changed since then. They
are no longer applicable unless major changes.

Is there any other group or "hidden svn" that maintain or contain up
to date stuff?
What's your best advice guys for this project? Is it realistic to
take it back or not?

Thanks a lot
David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAkmMaYgACgkQSvfBSxa9hWPZ3QCfb2ahSmRDUlu1wvnr6JOCRt6Z
mFoAoL7r5RaplUwOw1+WLYuktzP2N+i+
=LGaK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: ct_sync project update

[Maximilian Wilhelm]

Anno domini 2009 David Goulet scripsit:

Hi!

> For a University Project, I'm trying to take back the ct_sync
> project and make it work on >= linux kernel 2.6.26. The last patches
> I found are for linux 2.6.10 and much have changed since then. They
> are no longer applicable unless major changes.

I some time ago[tm] made up patches for 2.6.15/16.
If you *really* want to go for ct_sync, you might want to have a look
at http://files.rfc2324.org/patches/ct_sync/

> Is there any other group or "hidden svn" that maintain or contain up
> to date stuff?
> What's your best advice guys for this project? Is it realistic to
> take it back or not?

Why do you want to?
The user space deamon conntrackd has been developed and evolved as a
successor of ct_sync and can be used with any current kernel
supporting netlink without patching.

Ciao
Max
-- 
	Follow the white penguin.

Re: ct_sync project update

[Pablo Neira Ayuso]

Maximilian Wilhelm wrote:
> Anno domini 2009 David Goulet scripsit:
> 
> Hi!
> 
>> For a University Project, I'm trying to take back the ct_sync
>> project and make it work on >= linux kernel 2.6.26. The last patches
>> I found are for linux 2.6.10 and much have changed since then. They
>> are no longer applicable unless major changes.
> 
> I some time ago[tm] made up patches for 2.6.15/16.
> If you *really* want to go for ct_sync, you might want to have a look
> at http://files.rfc2324.org/patches/ct_sync/
> 
>> Is there any other group or "hidden svn" that maintain or contain up
>> to date stuff?
>> What's your best advice guys for this project? Is it realistic to
>> take it back or not?
> 
> Why do you want to?
> The user space deamon conntrackd has been developed and evolved as a
> successor of ct_sync and can be used with any current kernel
> supporting netlink without patching.

Indeed:

http://conntrack-tools.netfilter.org/

-- 
"Los honestos son inadaptados sociales" -- Les Luthiers

ct_sync project update

[David Goulet]

Hi people,

For a University Project, I'm trying to take back the ct_sync
project and make it work on >= linux kernel 2.6.26. The lastest patches
I found are for linux 2.6.10 and much have changed since then. They
are no longer applicable unless major changes are made.

Is there any other group or "hidden svn" that maintain or contain up
to date stuff?
What's your best advice guys for this project? Is it realistic to
take it back or not?

Thanks a lot
David

Re: ct_sync project update

[Pablo Neira Ayuso]

David Goulet wrote:
> Hi people,
> 
> For a University Project, I'm trying to take back the ct_sync
> project and make it work on >= linux kernel 2.6.26. The lastest patches
> I found are for linux 2.6.10 and much have changed since then. They
> are no longer applicable unless major changes are made.
> 
> Is there any other group or "hidden svn" that maintain or contain up
> to date stuff?
> What's your best advice guys for this project? Is it realistic to
> take it back or not?

Am we in time-loop or something? I think that we've already replied this
question:

http://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=123405664030924&w=2

-- 
"Los honestos son inadaptados sociales" -- Les Luthiers