From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH] libxtables: Introduce xtables_afinfo Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:39:16 +0100 Message-ID: <49904E24.9090104@trash.net> References: <1234026339.4441.24.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com> <1234035818.4441.36.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com> <4990411F.5060509@trash.net> <49904E0F.4090406@netfilter.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: hadi@cyberus.ca, Jan Engelhardt , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:57583 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754520AbZBIPjT (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:39:19 -0500 In-Reply-To: <49904E0F.4090406@netfilter.org> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > Patrick McHardy wrote: >> jamal wrote: >>> On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 20:05 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >>>> ess. >>>> >>>> This afinfo thing has been a red LED beam in my eye. I just do not >>>> think >>>> iproute2-m_ipt should have to deal with afinfo at all. >>>> .. >>>> So I now also dealt with that and moved it according to what I think >>>> is right - see latest git commit in mine; [77f48c2] >>> >>> Ok, tried that looks good. I prefer the approach you have. So >>> discard the patch i posted. >> >> I'm a bit unsynced right now because I lost a harddisk and couldn't >> follow emails. Could you resend the agreed-upon patches that you >> want me to apply please? > > Jan has sent them to netfilter-users instead of netfilter-devel by > mistake there this morning. Look there. The reason why I'm asking is that I have a huge amount of mails to catch up with and want to avoid reading through long threads just to find out that the patch has been withdrawn at the end. So I prefer a resubmission in any case.