From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] netfilter: xtables: add PKTTYPE target Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:22:09 +0100 Message-ID: <49918D91.60801@trash.net> References: <20090128145801.7501.44459.stgit@Decadence> <20090128145826.7501.34671.stgit@Decadence> <4990480D.9060900@trash.net> <4990B910.1050802@netfilter.org> <49918948.5010103@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Jozsef Kadlecsik Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:53753 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752960AbZBJOWN (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:22:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote: > On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >> Yes, I know, I'm just wondering why you're using TCP at all for >> synchronizing. Its not for traffic from the Internet I assume >> since the node it ends up on is unknown to the outside anyways. > > No, that's not the syncronizing traffic, but the "normal" TCP traffic to > be filtered by the firewalls, which have got multicast MAC addresses on > their interfaces. Multicast traffic is accepted for forwarding just fine, its just local TCP delivery thats refusing it. So it can't be forwarded traffic.