netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Netfilter Developers <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Network Development list <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] netfilter: xt_physdev fixes
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:36:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <499C4739.3000800@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <499C3871.4030600@cosmosbay.com>

Hi Patrick

Please find following patch to prepare next one (loop unrolling)

I am not sure xt_physdev_info is aligned, either on an int or a long,
so please check my assertion before applying :)



Thank you

[PATCH] netfilter: xt_physdev fixes

1) physdev_mt() incorrectly assumes nulldevname[] is aligned on an int

2) It also uses word comparisons, while it could use long word ones.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
---
diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_physdev.c b/net/netfilter/xt_physdev.c
index 1bcdfc1..4b13ef7 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/xt_physdev.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_physdev.c
@@ -24,9 +24,9 @@ static bool
 physdev_mt(const struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_match_param *par)
 {
 	int i;
-	static const char nulldevname[IFNAMSIZ];
+	static const char nulldevname[IFNAMSIZ] __attribute__((aligned(sizeof(long))));
 	const struct xt_physdev_info *info = par->matchinfo;
-	bool ret;
+	unsigned long ret;
 	const char *indev, *outdev;
 	const struct nf_bridge_info *nf_bridge;
 
@@ -68,10 +68,10 @@ physdev_mt(const struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_match_param *par)
 	if (!(info->bitmask & XT_PHYSDEV_OP_IN))
 		goto match_outdev;
 	indev = nf_bridge->physindev ? nf_bridge->physindev->name : nulldevname;
-	for (i = 0, ret = false; i < IFNAMSIZ/sizeof(unsigned int); i++) {
-		ret |= (((const unsigned int *)indev)[i]
-			^ ((const unsigned int *)info->physindev)[i])
-			& ((const unsigned int *)info->in_mask)[i];
+	for (i = 0, ret = 0; i < IFNAMSIZ/sizeof(unsigned long); i++) {
+		ret |= (((const unsigned long *)indev)[i]
+			^ ((const unsigned long *)info->physindev)[i])
+			& ((const unsigned long *)info->in_mask)[i];
 	}
 
 	if (!ret ^ !(info->invert & XT_PHYSDEV_OP_IN))
@@ -82,13 +82,12 @@ match_outdev:
 		return true;
 	outdev = nf_bridge->physoutdev ?
 		 nf_bridge->physoutdev->name : nulldevname;
-	for (i = 0, ret = false; i < IFNAMSIZ/sizeof(unsigned int); i++) {
-		ret |= (((const unsigned int *)outdev)[i]
-			^ ((const unsigned int *)info->physoutdev)[i])
-			& ((const unsigned int *)info->out_mask)[i];
+	for (i = 0, ret = 0; i < IFNAMSIZ/sizeof(unsigned long); i++) {
+		ret |= (((const unsigned long *)outdev)[i]
+			^ ((const unsigned long *)info->physoutdev)[i])
+			& ((const unsigned long *)info->out_mask)[i];
 	}
-
-	return ret ^ !(info->invert & XT_PHYSDEV_OP_OUT);
+	return (!!ret ^ !(info->invert & XT_PHYSDEV_OP_OUT));
 }
 
 static bool physdev_mt_check(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-02-18 17:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-26 22:15 32 core net-next stack/netfilter "scaling" Rick Jones
2009-01-26 23:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-26 23:14   ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-01-26 23:19   ` Rick Jones
2009-01-27  9:10     ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-27  9:15       ` Patrick McHardy
2009-01-27 11:29         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-27 11:37           ` Patrick McHardy
2009-01-27 16:23         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-27 17:33           ` Patrick McHardy
2009-01-27 18:02             ` Rick Jones
2009-01-27 19:09               ` Rick Jones
2009-01-27 19:24                 ` Rick Jones
2009-01-27 22:17                   ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-27 22:29                     ` Rick Jones
2009-01-27 22:34                       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-27 22:43                         ` Rick Jones
2009-01-28 13:55                   ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-28 16:25                     ` Patrick McHardy
2009-01-28 17:07                       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-28 17:34                         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-29 15:31                           ` [PATCH] netfilter: unfold two critical loops in ip_packet_match() Eric Dumazet
2009-01-30 15:47                             ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-30 16:54                               ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-30 17:27                                 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-30 17:27                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-30 17:50                                     ` Andi Kleen
2009-02-09 13:41                                   ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-18 15:10                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2009-02-18 15:21                                       ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-18 16:33                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-02-18 16:52                                           ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-18 17:36                                           ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-02-18 18:14                                             ` [PATCH] netfilter: xt_physdev fixes Patrick McHardy
2009-02-19  8:00                                               ` [PATCH] netfilter: unfold two loops in physdev_mt() Eric Dumazet
2009-02-19  8:14                                                 ` [PATCH] netfilter: unfold two loops in ip6_packet_match() Eric Dumazet
2009-02-19 10:19                                                   ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-19 10:17                                                 ` [PATCH] netfilter: unfold two loops in physdev_mt() Patrick McHardy
2009-02-20 10:02                             ` [PATCH] netfilter: unfold two critical loops in ip_packet_match() Eric Dumazet
2009-02-20 10:04                               ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-09 14:57                           ` 32 core net-next stack/netfilter "scaling" Patrick McHardy
2009-02-10 18:44   ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=499C4739.3000800@cosmosbay.com \
    --to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).