From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Netfilter Developers <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Network Development list <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] netfilter: xt_physdev fixes
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:36:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <499C4739.3000800@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <499C3871.4030600@cosmosbay.com>
Hi Patrick
Please find following patch to prepare next one (loop unrolling)
I am not sure xt_physdev_info is aligned, either on an int or a long,
so please check my assertion before applying :)
Thank you
[PATCH] netfilter: xt_physdev fixes
1) physdev_mt() incorrectly assumes nulldevname[] is aligned on an int
2) It also uses word comparisons, while it could use long word ones.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
---
diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_physdev.c b/net/netfilter/xt_physdev.c
index 1bcdfc1..4b13ef7 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/xt_physdev.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_physdev.c
@@ -24,9 +24,9 @@ static bool
physdev_mt(const struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_match_param *par)
{
int i;
- static const char nulldevname[IFNAMSIZ];
+ static const char nulldevname[IFNAMSIZ] __attribute__((aligned(sizeof(long))));
const struct xt_physdev_info *info = par->matchinfo;
- bool ret;
+ unsigned long ret;
const char *indev, *outdev;
const struct nf_bridge_info *nf_bridge;
@@ -68,10 +68,10 @@ physdev_mt(const struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_match_param *par)
if (!(info->bitmask & XT_PHYSDEV_OP_IN))
goto match_outdev;
indev = nf_bridge->physindev ? nf_bridge->physindev->name : nulldevname;
- for (i = 0, ret = false; i < IFNAMSIZ/sizeof(unsigned int); i++) {
- ret |= (((const unsigned int *)indev)[i]
- ^ ((const unsigned int *)info->physindev)[i])
- & ((const unsigned int *)info->in_mask)[i];
+ for (i = 0, ret = 0; i < IFNAMSIZ/sizeof(unsigned long); i++) {
+ ret |= (((const unsigned long *)indev)[i]
+ ^ ((const unsigned long *)info->physindev)[i])
+ & ((const unsigned long *)info->in_mask)[i];
}
if (!ret ^ !(info->invert & XT_PHYSDEV_OP_IN))
@@ -82,13 +82,12 @@ match_outdev:
return true;
outdev = nf_bridge->physoutdev ?
nf_bridge->physoutdev->name : nulldevname;
- for (i = 0, ret = false; i < IFNAMSIZ/sizeof(unsigned int); i++) {
- ret |= (((const unsigned int *)outdev)[i]
- ^ ((const unsigned int *)info->physoutdev)[i])
- & ((const unsigned int *)info->out_mask)[i];
+ for (i = 0, ret = 0; i < IFNAMSIZ/sizeof(unsigned long); i++) {
+ ret |= (((const unsigned long *)outdev)[i]
+ ^ ((const unsigned long *)info->physoutdev)[i])
+ & ((const unsigned long *)info->out_mask)[i];
}
-
- return ret ^ !(info->invert & XT_PHYSDEV_OP_OUT);
+ return (!!ret ^ !(info->invert & XT_PHYSDEV_OP_OUT));
}
static bool physdev_mt_check(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-18 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-26 22:15 32 core net-next stack/netfilter "scaling" Rick Jones
2009-01-26 23:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-26 23:14 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-01-26 23:19 ` Rick Jones
2009-01-27 9:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-27 9:15 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-01-27 11:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-27 11:37 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-01-27 16:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-27 17:33 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-01-27 18:02 ` Rick Jones
2009-01-27 19:09 ` Rick Jones
2009-01-27 19:24 ` Rick Jones
2009-01-27 22:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-27 22:29 ` Rick Jones
2009-01-27 22:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-27 22:43 ` Rick Jones
2009-01-28 13:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-28 16:25 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-01-28 17:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-28 17:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-29 15:31 ` [PATCH] netfilter: unfold two critical loops in ip_packet_match() Eric Dumazet
2009-01-30 15:47 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-30 16:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-30 17:27 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-30 17:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-30 17:50 ` Andi Kleen
2009-02-09 13:41 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-18 15:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-02-18 15:21 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-18 16:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-02-18 16:52 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-18 17:36 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-02-18 18:14 ` [PATCH] netfilter: xt_physdev fixes Patrick McHardy
2009-02-19 8:00 ` [PATCH] netfilter: unfold two loops in physdev_mt() Eric Dumazet
2009-02-19 8:14 ` [PATCH] netfilter: unfold two loops in ip6_packet_match() Eric Dumazet
2009-02-19 10:19 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-19 10:17 ` [PATCH] netfilter: unfold two loops in physdev_mt() Patrick McHardy
2009-02-20 10:02 ` [PATCH] netfilter: unfold two critical loops in ip_packet_match() Eric Dumazet
2009-02-20 10:04 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-09 14:57 ` 32 core net-next stack/netfilter "scaling" Patrick McHardy
2009-02-10 18:44 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=499C4739.3000800@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).