From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iptables: expose option to zero packet and byte counters
 for a specific rule using iptables/ip6tables
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:21:31 +0100
Message-ID: <499D32AB.1050309@trash.net>
References: <4700595.31361234988274007.JavaMail.root@tahiti.vyatta.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
To: Mohit Mehta <mohit.mehta@vyatta.com>
Return-path: <netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:46110 "EHLO
	stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752631AbZBSKVd (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:21:33 -0500
In-Reply-To: <4700595.31361234988274007.JavaMail.root@tahiti.vyatta.com>
Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org>

Mohit Mehta wrote:
>> Please rediff your patch against the current tree.
> 
> diff for iptables.c -
> 
> --- iptables.c.orig     2009-02-18 11:26:31.000000000 -0800
> +++ iptables.c  2009-02-18 11:38:30.000000000 -0800

That patch is whitespace-mangled and also doesn't apply.