From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH] iptables: lock free counters Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 11:55:29 +0100 Message-ID: <49ABBB21.9080401@trash.net> References: <20090218051906.174295181@vyatta.com> <20090218052747.321329022@vyatta.com> <20090219114719.560999b5@extreme> <499DEF49.3040602@cosmosbay.com> <49A7F262.8040805@cosmosbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Stephen Hemminger , David Miller , Rick Jones , netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:41917 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755541AbZCBKzf (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2009 05:55:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <49A7F262.8040805@cosmosbay.com> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Eric Dumazet wrote: > # time iptables -nvL > Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 416M packets, 64G bytes) > pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination > > Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) > pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination > > Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 401M packets, 62G bytes) > pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination > > real 0m1.810s > user 0m0.000s > sys 0m0.001s Thats really slow ... > CONFIG_NO_HZ=y > CONFIG_HZ_1000=y > CONFIG_HZ=1000 > > One cpu is 100% handling softirqs, could it be the problem ? Is this fixed by your RCU quiescent state fix?