From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH] iptables: lock free counters Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:56:39 +0100 Message-ID: <49AC5617.8020404@trash.net> References: <20090218051906.174295181@vyatta.com> <20090218052747.321329022@vyatta.com> <20090219114719.560999b5@extreme> <499DEF49.3040602@cosmosbay.com> <49A7F262.8040805@cosmosbay.com> <49ABBB21.9080401@trash.net> <49AC1B9D.5030107@cosmosbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Stephen Hemminger , David Miller , Rick Jones , netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: In-Reply-To: <49AC1B9D.5030107@cosmosbay.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Eric Dumazet wrote: > Patrick McHardy a =E9crit : >> Eric Dumazet wrote: >>> real 0m1.810s >>> user 0m0.000s >>> sys 0m0.001s >> Thats really slow ... >> >>> CONFIG_NO_HZ=3Dy >>> CONFIG_HZ_1000=3Dy >>> CONFIG_HZ=3D1000 >>> >>> One cpu is 100% handling softirqs, could it be the problem ? >> Is this fixed by your RCU quiescent state fix? >=20 > Yes it is :) Great, thanks :)