From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@diku.dk>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iptables: new strict host model match
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 23:12:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49AC59CE.8000703@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090302105310.6c247f88@s6510>
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 14:42:33 +0100 (CET)
> Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@diku.dk> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>
>>> This is a simple little iptables match that can be used to create the Strong
>>> End System model, that router and other non-Linux customers expect. There
>>> are management and other applications that use ping and expect to only get
>>> a response when the interface with that address is up. Normally, a Linux
>>> system will respond to a packet that arrives for any of the system addresses
>>> independent of which link it arrives on.
>> Is this no almost the same as:
>>
>> echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/arp_ignore
>>
>>
>
> That doesn't work when system already has an ARP entry and link goes down.
I think it would make sense to define the differences in behaviour
that are expected when acting according to the strict host model.
It very unlikely that all of this can be achieved with iptables,
and if what can be done is still useful, the limitations should be
known.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-02 22:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-27 1:52 [PATCH] iptables: new strict host model match Stephen Hemminger
2009-02-27 3:16 ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-02-27 3:23 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-02-27 8:30 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2009-02-28 1:53 ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-02-28 2:10 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-02-28 8:27 ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-03-02 11:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-02 13:42 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-03-02 13:46 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-03-02 18:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-03-02 22:12 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49AC59CE.8000703@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hawk@diku.dk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).